TY - JOUR
T1 - Interventions provided by physiotherapists to prevent complications after major gastrointestinal cancer surgery
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - White, Sarah
AU - Mani, Sarine
AU - Martin, Romany
AU - Reeve, Julie
AU - Waterland, Jamie L.
AU - Haines, Kimberley J.
AU - Boden, Ianthe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Background/Objectives: Major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer carries a 50% risk of postoperative complications. Physiotherapists commonly provide interventions to patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer with the intent of preventing complications and improving recovery. However, the evidence is unclear if physiotherapy is effective compared to providing no physiotherapy, nor if timing of service delivery during the perioperative pathway influences outcomes. The objective of this review is to evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effects of perioperative physiotherapy interventions delivered with prophylactic intent on postoperative outcomes compared to no treatment or early mobilisation alone. Methods: A protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and a systematic review performed of four databases. Randomised controlled trials examining prophylactic physiotherapy interventions in adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer were eligible for inclusion. Results: Nine publications from eight randomised controlled trials were included with a total sample of 1418 participants. Due to inconsistent reporting of other perioperative complications, meta-analysis of the effect of physiotherapy was only possible specific to postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). This found an estimated 59% reduction in risk with exposure to physiotherapy interventions (RR 0.41, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.73, p < 0.001). Sub-group analysis demonstrated that timing of delivery may be important, with physiotherapy delivered only in the preoperative phase or combined with a postoperative service significantly reducing PPC risk (RR 0.32, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.60, p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (MD–1.4 days, 95%CI −2.24 to −0.58, p = 0.01), whilst the effect of postoperative physiotherapy alone was less certain. Conclusions: Preoperative-alone and perioperative physiotherapy is likely to minimise the risk of PPCs in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer. This challenges current traditional paradigms of providing physiotherapy only in the postoperative phase of surgery. A review with broader scope and component network analysis is required to confirm this.
AB - Background/Objectives: Major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer carries a 50% risk of postoperative complications. Physiotherapists commonly provide interventions to patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer with the intent of preventing complications and improving recovery. However, the evidence is unclear if physiotherapy is effective compared to providing no physiotherapy, nor if timing of service delivery during the perioperative pathway influences outcomes. The objective of this review is to evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effects of perioperative physiotherapy interventions delivered with prophylactic intent on postoperative outcomes compared to no treatment or early mobilisation alone. Methods: A protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO and a systematic review performed of four databases. Randomised controlled trials examining prophylactic physiotherapy interventions in adults undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer were eligible for inclusion. Results: Nine publications from eight randomised controlled trials were included with a total sample of 1418 participants. Due to inconsistent reporting of other perioperative complications, meta-analysis of the effect of physiotherapy was only possible specific to postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). This found an estimated 59% reduction in risk with exposure to physiotherapy interventions (RR 0.41, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.73, p < 0.001). Sub-group analysis demonstrated that timing of delivery may be important, with physiotherapy delivered only in the preoperative phase or combined with a postoperative service significantly reducing PPC risk (RR 0.32, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.60, p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (MD–1.4 days, 95%CI −2.24 to −0.58, p = 0.01), whilst the effect of postoperative physiotherapy alone was less certain. Conclusions: Preoperative-alone and perioperative physiotherapy is likely to minimise the risk of PPCs in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for cancer. This challenges current traditional paradigms of providing physiotherapy only in the postoperative phase of surgery. A review with broader scope and component network analysis is required to confirm this.
KW - gastrointestinal cancer
KW - gastrointestinal surgery
KW - length of stay
KW - perioperative
KW - physiotherapy
KW - pneumonia
KW - postoperative
KW - postoperative complications
KW - postoperative pulmonary complications
KW - preoperative
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218874134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85218874134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/cancers17040676
DO - 10.3390/cancers17040676
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40002270
AN - SCOPUS:85218874134
SN - 2072-6694
VL - 17
JO - Cancers
JF - Cancers
IS - 4
M1 - 676
ER -