Investigating over-allocation of water using risk analysis: A case study in Tasmania, Australia

Melinda Lambourne, Kathleen Bowmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The determination of a sustainable level of extraction is a challenge to water reform and planning, especially where information on environmental assets is sparse, and where future flow regime is threatened by irrigation and climate change. Hamstead (2009) considered a catchment to be over-allocated and/or overused if projected changes in freshwater flow posed a medium or higher level of risk to key ecological assets. The present paper investigates Hamstead's (2009) two-step risk analysis process by using the Coal Pitt Water Catchment in Tasmania, Australia, where the Ramsar-listed Pittwater'Orielton Lagoon was identified as the key ecological asset. Although Hamstead's (2009) approach revealed over-allocation and/or overuse, several limitations emerged. In particular, setting the current condition as the baseline ecosystem condition, rather than that at the time of Ramsar listing, permits over-allocation and/or overuse to continue and contravenes international, national and state obligations. Projections could be improved by inclusion of a river condition index and hydrological indicators such as proportion of total natural flow retained, frequency of estuary flushing, and percentage of median annual flow impounded. Available ecological information and projected hydrological change should be included in determining the threat to environmental assets because statutory obligations require strategies to manage processes that threaten species and communities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)761-773
Number of pages13
JournalMarine and Freshwater Research
Volume64
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

water allocation
risk analysis
assets
Tasmania
case studies
catchment
water
hydrological change
flushing
coal
lagoon
estuaries
planning
estuary
climate change
irrigation
rivers
allocation
ecosystems
ecosystem

Cite this

@article{ac7271e9fb2f476c80441d1d9f24ab28,
title = "Investigating over-allocation of water using risk analysis: A case study in Tasmania, Australia",
abstract = "The determination of a sustainable level of extraction is a challenge to water reform and planning, especially where information on environmental assets is sparse, and where future flow regime is threatened by irrigation and climate change. Hamstead (2009) considered a catchment to be over-allocated and/or overused if projected changes in freshwater flow posed a medium or higher level of risk to key ecological assets. The present paper investigates Hamstead's (2009) two-step risk analysis process by using the Coal Pitt Water Catchment in Tasmania, Australia, where the Ramsar-listed Pittwater'Orielton Lagoon was identified as the key ecological asset. Although Hamstead's (2009) approach revealed over-allocation and/or overuse, several limitations emerged. In particular, setting the current condition as the baseline ecosystem condition, rather than that at the time of Ramsar listing, permits over-allocation and/or overuse to continue and contravenes international, national and state obligations. Projections could be improved by inclusion of a river condition index and hydrological indicators such as proportion of total natural flow retained, frequency of estuary flushing, and percentage of median annual flow impounded. Available ecological information and projected hydrological change should be included in determining the threat to environmental assets because statutory obligations require strategies to manage processes that threaten species and communities.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Environmental flows, Rivers, Sustainability, Water policy",
author = "Melinda Lambourne and Kathleen Bowmer",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: 086 FoR could not be migrated (05012 - ). month (773h) = March, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Marine and Freshwater Research. ISSNs: 1323-1650;",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1071/MF12282",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "761--773",
journal = "Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research",
issn = "0067-1940",
publisher = "CSIRO Publishing",
number = "8",

}

Investigating over-allocation of water using risk analysis : A case study in Tasmania, Australia. / Lambourne, Melinda; Bowmer, Kathleen.

In: Marine and Freshwater Research, Vol. 64, No. 8, 03.2013, p. 761-773.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating over-allocation of water using risk analysis

T2 - A case study in Tasmania, Australia

AU - Lambourne, Melinda

AU - Bowmer, Kathleen

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: 086 FoR could not be migrated (05012 - ). month (773h) = March, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Marine and Freshwater Research. ISSNs: 1323-1650;

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The determination of a sustainable level of extraction is a challenge to water reform and planning, especially where information on environmental assets is sparse, and where future flow regime is threatened by irrigation and climate change. Hamstead (2009) considered a catchment to be over-allocated and/or overused if projected changes in freshwater flow posed a medium or higher level of risk to key ecological assets. The present paper investigates Hamstead's (2009) two-step risk analysis process by using the Coal Pitt Water Catchment in Tasmania, Australia, where the Ramsar-listed Pittwater'Orielton Lagoon was identified as the key ecological asset. Although Hamstead's (2009) approach revealed over-allocation and/or overuse, several limitations emerged. In particular, setting the current condition as the baseline ecosystem condition, rather than that at the time of Ramsar listing, permits over-allocation and/or overuse to continue and contravenes international, national and state obligations. Projections could be improved by inclusion of a river condition index and hydrological indicators such as proportion of total natural flow retained, frequency of estuary flushing, and percentage of median annual flow impounded. Available ecological information and projected hydrological change should be included in determining the threat to environmental assets because statutory obligations require strategies to manage processes that threaten species and communities.

AB - The determination of a sustainable level of extraction is a challenge to water reform and planning, especially where information on environmental assets is sparse, and where future flow regime is threatened by irrigation and climate change. Hamstead (2009) considered a catchment to be over-allocated and/or overused if projected changes in freshwater flow posed a medium or higher level of risk to key ecological assets. The present paper investigates Hamstead's (2009) two-step risk analysis process by using the Coal Pitt Water Catchment in Tasmania, Australia, where the Ramsar-listed Pittwater'Orielton Lagoon was identified as the key ecological asset. Although Hamstead's (2009) approach revealed over-allocation and/or overuse, several limitations emerged. In particular, setting the current condition as the baseline ecosystem condition, rather than that at the time of Ramsar listing, permits over-allocation and/or overuse to continue and contravenes international, national and state obligations. Projections could be improved by inclusion of a river condition index and hydrological indicators such as proportion of total natural flow retained, frequency of estuary flushing, and percentage of median annual flow impounded. Available ecological information and projected hydrological change should be included in determining the threat to environmental assets because statutory obligations require strategies to manage processes that threaten species and communities.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Environmental flows

KW - Rivers

KW - Sustainability

KW - Water policy

U2 - 10.1071/MF12282

DO - 10.1071/MF12282

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 761

EP - 773

JO - Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research

JF - Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research

SN - 0067-1940

IS - 8

ER -