Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person

John O'Carroll, Chris Fleming

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This essay develops a hypothesis concerning both privatization itself and its relation to modernity.Privatization-in-general (as opposed to the 1980s manifestations we still call privatization) had its genesis in the sixteenth century Reformation and counter-Reformation. From this theological space,it unfolded in a distinctively moral way through a variety of theatres, and as it did so, it found in each of these a new articulation. Arising in what was then becoming 'the West,' it had a determined character, in that in an anthropological sense it was closely linked to the Judaeo-Christian notion of the sacredness of the person. As a result, as privatization carved ' and carves ' its ongoing paths through these theatres ' philosophical, economic, legal, educational, aesthetic, political ' it threaten sexisting orders, even as it holds out the promise of ever-new versions of the private (and its opposites, the public, the social, and so on). The authors contend that this view of privatization proffers a new way of grasping and defining modernity itself (although it is beyond the purview of the essay to do more than indicate the shape of such definition). The account offered limits itself to showing the moral nature and genesis of privatization, and explores examples of its emergence in selected fields. It does so in a spirit of hypothesis and illustration, rather than of demonstration or exhaustiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-120
Number of pages21
JournalNebula
Volume6
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Privatization
Person
Genesis
Modernity
Aesthetics
Counter-reformation
1980s
Manifestation
Reformation
Sacredness
Articulation
Education
Economics

Cite this

O'Carroll, J., & Fleming, C. (2009). Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person. Nebula, 6(3), 100-120.
O'Carroll, John ; Fleming, Chris. / Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person. In: Nebula. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 100-120.
@article{72583fe065764d91b2eda3d1f7e26676,
title = "Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person",
abstract = "This essay develops a hypothesis concerning both privatization itself and its relation to modernity.Privatization-in-general (as opposed to the 1980s manifestations we still call privatization) had its genesis in the sixteenth century Reformation and counter-Reformation. From this theological space,it unfolded in a distinctively moral way through a variety of theatres, and as it did so, it found in each of these a new articulation. Arising in what was then becoming 'the West,' it had a determined character, in that in an anthropological sense it was closely linked to the Judaeo-Christian notion of the sacredness of the person. As a result, as privatization carved ' and carves ' its ongoing paths through these theatres ' philosophical, economic, legal, educational, aesthetic, political ' it threaten sexisting orders, even as it holds out the promise of ever-new versions of the private (and its opposites, the public, the social, and so on). The authors contend that this view of privatization proffers a new way of grasping and defining modernity itself (although it is beyond the purview of the essay to do more than indicate the shape of such definition). The account offered limits itself to showing the moral nature and genesis of privatization, and explores examples of its emergence in selected fields. It does so in a spirit of hypothesis and illustration, rather than of demonstration or exhaustiveness.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Morality, Private, Privatization, Reformation, Self",
author = "John O'Carroll and Chris Fleming",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Nebula. ISSNs: 1449-7751;",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "100--120",
journal = "Nebula",
issn = "1449-7751",
number = "3",

}

O'Carroll, J & Fleming, C 2009, 'Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person', Nebula, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 100-120.

Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person. / O'Carroll, John; Fleming, Chris.

In: Nebula, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2009, p. 100-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person

AU - O'Carroll, John

AU - Fleming, Chris

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Nebula. ISSNs: 1449-7751;

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This essay develops a hypothesis concerning both privatization itself and its relation to modernity.Privatization-in-general (as opposed to the 1980s manifestations we still call privatization) had its genesis in the sixteenth century Reformation and counter-Reformation. From this theological space,it unfolded in a distinctively moral way through a variety of theatres, and as it did so, it found in each of these a new articulation. Arising in what was then becoming 'the West,' it had a determined character, in that in an anthropological sense it was closely linked to the Judaeo-Christian notion of the sacredness of the person. As a result, as privatization carved ' and carves ' its ongoing paths through these theatres ' philosophical, economic, legal, educational, aesthetic, political ' it threaten sexisting orders, even as it holds out the promise of ever-new versions of the private (and its opposites, the public, the social, and so on). The authors contend that this view of privatization proffers a new way of grasping and defining modernity itself (although it is beyond the purview of the essay to do more than indicate the shape of such definition). The account offered limits itself to showing the moral nature and genesis of privatization, and explores examples of its emergence in selected fields. It does so in a spirit of hypothesis and illustration, rather than of demonstration or exhaustiveness.

AB - This essay develops a hypothesis concerning both privatization itself and its relation to modernity.Privatization-in-general (as opposed to the 1980s manifestations we still call privatization) had its genesis in the sixteenth century Reformation and counter-Reformation. From this theological space,it unfolded in a distinctively moral way through a variety of theatres, and as it did so, it found in each of these a new articulation. Arising in what was then becoming 'the West,' it had a determined character, in that in an anthropological sense it was closely linked to the Judaeo-Christian notion of the sacredness of the person. As a result, as privatization carved ' and carves ' its ongoing paths through these theatres ' philosophical, economic, legal, educational, aesthetic, political ' it threaten sexisting orders, even as it holds out the promise of ever-new versions of the private (and its opposites, the public, the social, and so on). The authors contend that this view of privatization proffers a new way of grasping and defining modernity itself (although it is beyond the purview of the essay to do more than indicate the shape of such definition). The account offered limits itself to showing the moral nature and genesis of privatization, and explores examples of its emergence in selected fields. It does so in a spirit of hypothesis and illustration, rather than of demonstration or exhaustiveness.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Morality

KW - Private

KW - Privatization

KW - Reformation

KW - Self

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 100

EP - 120

JO - Nebula

JF - Nebula

SN - 1449-7751

IS - 3

ER -

O'Carroll J, Fleming C. Is nothing sacred? Privatization and the Person. Nebula. 2009;6(3):100-120.