Is the environment getting its fair share? An analysis of the Australian water reform process using a social justice framework

Anna Lukasiewicz, Geoffrey J. Syme, Karen Bowmer, Penelope Davidson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Australia is currently undergoing fundamental and far-reaching reforms in water management that have been prompted by wide-spread environmental degradation caused by past water management practices. This paper is an extract of a wider study that explores how governments incorporate social justice into water reform policies and how that effort is perceived by non-government stakeholders. Using a comprehensive social justice framework, we used a mixed methods approach that combines a quantitative content analysis of key water reform documents with a qualitative semistructured interview process to identify and analyse three principles of social justicethat apply to the environment as a water stakeholder: need as a distributive justice principle, and representativeness and accuracy as procedural justice principles.We found that the environment is identified as a legitimate water stakeholder whose needs are meant to be assured through the water reform process. However the environment suffers from a crisis of identity. Other water stakeholders claim to speak for the environment but say different things. Thus, due to a diversity of voices, strong government intention to satisfy environmental needs is diluted in practice. Furthermore, the prerogative to define and measure environmental needs through science, while deemed to be fair and objective, leads to unintended consequences that complicate management and disenfranchise less scientifically-capable stakeholders.Overall, we believe that the formal recognition of the environment as a stakeholder in water reform is a significant forward step but its crisis of identity must be resolved before the environment can fully utilise its new role as a stakeholder.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-252
Number of pages22
JournalSocial Justice Research
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

social justice
stakeholder
water
reform
water management
distributive justice
reform policy
environmental damage
qualitative interview
content analysis
justice
science
management

Cite this

@article{af7b114b7ef9455b91b348fb166de8c8,
title = "Is the environment getting its fair share? An analysis of the Australian water reform process using a social justice framework",
abstract = "Australia is currently undergoing fundamental and far-reaching reforms in water management that have been prompted by wide-spread environmental degradation caused by past water management practices. This paper is an extract of a wider study that explores how governments incorporate social justice into water reform policies and how that effort is perceived by non-government stakeholders. Using a comprehensive social justice framework, we used a mixed methods approach that combines a quantitative content analysis of key water reform documents with a qualitative semistructured interview process to identify and analyse three principles of social justicethat apply to the environment as a water stakeholder: need as a distributive justice principle, and representativeness and accuracy as procedural justice principles.We found that the environment is identified as a legitimate water stakeholder whose needs are meant to be assured through the water reform process. However the environment suffers from a crisis of identity. Other water stakeholders claim to speak for the environment but say different things. Thus, due to a diversity of voices, strong government intention to satisfy environmental needs is diluted in practice. Furthermore, the prerogative to define and measure environmental needs through science, while deemed to be fair and objective, leads to unintended consequences that complicate management and disenfranchise less scientifically-capable stakeholders.Overall, we believe that the formal recognition of the environment as a stakeholder in water reform is a significant forward step but its crisis of identity must be resolved before the environment can fully utilise its new role as a stakeholder.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Distributive justice, Environment, Procedural justice, Water reform",
author = "Anna Lukasiewicz and Syme, {Geoffrey J.} and Karen Bowmer and Penelope Davidson",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = September, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Social Justice Research. ISSNs: 0885-7466;",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11211-013-0186-y",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "231--252",
journal = "Social Justice Research",
issn = "0885-7466",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Is the environment getting its fair share? An analysis of the Australian water reform process using a social justice framework. / Lukasiewicz, Anna; Syme, Geoffrey J.; Bowmer, Karen; Davidson, Penelope.

In: Social Justice Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 231-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the environment getting its fair share? An analysis of the Australian water reform process using a social justice framework

AU - Lukasiewicz, Anna

AU - Syme, Geoffrey J.

AU - Bowmer, Karen

AU - Davidson, Penelope

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = September, 2013; Journal title (773t) = Social Justice Research. ISSNs: 0885-7466;

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Australia is currently undergoing fundamental and far-reaching reforms in water management that have been prompted by wide-spread environmental degradation caused by past water management practices. This paper is an extract of a wider study that explores how governments incorporate social justice into water reform policies and how that effort is perceived by non-government stakeholders. Using a comprehensive social justice framework, we used a mixed methods approach that combines a quantitative content analysis of key water reform documents with a qualitative semistructured interview process to identify and analyse three principles of social justicethat apply to the environment as a water stakeholder: need as a distributive justice principle, and representativeness and accuracy as procedural justice principles.We found that the environment is identified as a legitimate water stakeholder whose needs are meant to be assured through the water reform process. However the environment suffers from a crisis of identity. Other water stakeholders claim to speak for the environment but say different things. Thus, due to a diversity of voices, strong government intention to satisfy environmental needs is diluted in practice. Furthermore, the prerogative to define and measure environmental needs through science, while deemed to be fair and objective, leads to unintended consequences that complicate management and disenfranchise less scientifically-capable stakeholders.Overall, we believe that the formal recognition of the environment as a stakeholder in water reform is a significant forward step but its crisis of identity must be resolved before the environment can fully utilise its new role as a stakeholder.

AB - Australia is currently undergoing fundamental and far-reaching reforms in water management that have been prompted by wide-spread environmental degradation caused by past water management practices. This paper is an extract of a wider study that explores how governments incorporate social justice into water reform policies and how that effort is perceived by non-government stakeholders. Using a comprehensive social justice framework, we used a mixed methods approach that combines a quantitative content analysis of key water reform documents with a qualitative semistructured interview process to identify and analyse three principles of social justicethat apply to the environment as a water stakeholder: need as a distributive justice principle, and representativeness and accuracy as procedural justice principles.We found that the environment is identified as a legitimate water stakeholder whose needs are meant to be assured through the water reform process. However the environment suffers from a crisis of identity. Other water stakeholders claim to speak for the environment but say different things. Thus, due to a diversity of voices, strong government intention to satisfy environmental needs is diluted in practice. Furthermore, the prerogative to define and measure environmental needs through science, while deemed to be fair and objective, leads to unintended consequences that complicate management and disenfranchise less scientifically-capable stakeholders.Overall, we believe that the formal recognition of the environment as a stakeholder in water reform is a significant forward step but its crisis of identity must be resolved before the environment can fully utilise its new role as a stakeholder.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Distributive justice

KW - Environment

KW - Procedural justice

KW - Water reform

U2 - 10.1007/s11211-013-0186-y

DO - 10.1007/s11211-013-0186-y

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 231

EP - 252

JO - Social Justice Research

JF - Social Justice Research

SN - 0885-7466

IS - 3

ER -