It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy': Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How do we strike a balance for our students between knowing what, knowing how, knowing why and knowing whether to? This is one of the tensions that exists when we debate the importance of foundational learning/ studies on developing students' capacity and capability, as well as its inclusion in our formal university programs. There are competing dialogues about the privileging of 'oracy' and/ or 'reading and 'writing' as the most useful means of communicating in an intercultural W'nanga setting, and they both have traditions in ideological discourse. Or do they?In this Paper, government rhetoric concerning strategic emphasis needed by tertiary institutes to improve and stabilise literacy, language and numeracy capacity in students, is used as a background to explore aspects of the practice of oracy and literacy. The isolation of one before the other, or the dominance of one over the other serves as minimalist terrain that overshadows the importance of multiple ways of communicating to demonstrate literate capabilities.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSixth Biennial Conference
Subtitle of host publicationIntercultural communication across university settings: Myths and realities
Place of PublicationAuckland NZ
PublisherPearson Education
Pages1-6
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781877371509
Publication statusPublished - 2008
EventCommunication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference - Auckland, New Zealand
Duration: 29 Nov 200801 Dec 2008

Conference

ConferenceCommunication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference
CountryNew Zealand
Period29/11/0801/12/08

Fingerprint

literacy
student
social isolation
rhetoric
dialogue
inclusion
university
discourse
language
learning

Cite this

Mlcek, S. (2008). It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy': Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'. In Sixth Biennial Conference: Intercultural communication across university settings: Myths and realities (pp. 1-6). Auckland NZ: Pearson Education.
Mlcek, Susan. / It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy' : Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'. Sixth Biennial Conference: Intercultural communication across university settings: Myths and realities. Auckland NZ : Pearson Education, 2008. pp. 1-6
@inproceedings{050ed76a3e5e4d809138fd65ad6c5d81,
title = "It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy': Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'",
abstract = "How do we strike a balance for our students between knowing what, knowing how, knowing why and knowing whether to? This is one of the tensions that exists when we debate the importance of foundational learning/ studies on developing students' capacity and capability, as well as its inclusion in our formal university programs. There are competing dialogues about the privileging of 'oracy' and/ or 'reading and 'writing' as the most useful means of communicating in an intercultural W'nanga setting, and they both have traditions in ideological discourse. Or do they?In this Paper, government rhetoric concerning strategic emphasis needed by tertiary institutes to improve and stabilise literacy, language and numeracy capacity in students, is used as a background to explore aspects of the practice of oracy and literacy. The isolation of one before the other, or the dominance of one over the other serves as minimalist terrain that overshadows the importance of multiple ways of communicating to demonstrate literate capabilities.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Critical literacy, Diversity in the classroom and assisting students in transition, Innovative programmes for enhancing intercultural competency and academic literacy, Maori pedagogy, Whole-ness literacy",
author = "Susan Mlcek",
note = "Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Auckland NZ: Pearson Education, 2008. editor/s (773b) = Josta van Rij-Heyligers; Event dates (773o) = 29 November - 1 December 2008; Parent title (773t) = Communication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference.",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
pages = "1--6",
booktitle = "Sixth Biennial Conference",
publisher = "Pearson Education",

}

Mlcek, S 2008, It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy': Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'. in Sixth Biennial Conference: Intercultural communication across university settings: Myths and realities. Pearson Education, Auckland NZ, pp. 1-6, Communication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference, New Zealand, 29/11/08.

It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy' : Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'. / Mlcek, Susan.

Sixth Biennial Conference: Intercultural communication across university settings: Myths and realities. Auckland NZ : Pearson Education, 2008. p. 1-6.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

TY - GEN

T1 - It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy'

T2 - Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'

AU - Mlcek, Susan

N1 - Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Auckland NZ: Pearson Education, 2008. editor/s (773b) = Josta van Rij-Heyligers; Event dates (773o) = 29 November - 1 December 2008; Parent title (773t) = Communication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - How do we strike a balance for our students between knowing what, knowing how, knowing why and knowing whether to? This is one of the tensions that exists when we debate the importance of foundational learning/ studies on developing students' capacity and capability, as well as its inclusion in our formal university programs. There are competing dialogues about the privileging of 'oracy' and/ or 'reading and 'writing' as the most useful means of communicating in an intercultural W'nanga setting, and they both have traditions in ideological discourse. Or do they?In this Paper, government rhetoric concerning strategic emphasis needed by tertiary institutes to improve and stabilise literacy, language and numeracy capacity in students, is used as a background to explore aspects of the practice of oracy and literacy. The isolation of one before the other, or the dominance of one over the other serves as minimalist terrain that overshadows the importance of multiple ways of communicating to demonstrate literate capabilities.

AB - How do we strike a balance for our students between knowing what, knowing how, knowing why and knowing whether to? This is one of the tensions that exists when we debate the importance of foundational learning/ studies on developing students' capacity and capability, as well as its inclusion in our formal university programs. There are competing dialogues about the privileging of 'oracy' and/ or 'reading and 'writing' as the most useful means of communicating in an intercultural W'nanga setting, and they both have traditions in ideological discourse. Or do they?In this Paper, government rhetoric concerning strategic emphasis needed by tertiary institutes to improve and stabilise literacy, language and numeracy capacity in students, is used as a background to explore aspects of the practice of oracy and literacy. The isolation of one before the other, or the dominance of one over the other serves as minimalist terrain that overshadows the importance of multiple ways of communicating to demonstrate literate capabilities.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Critical literacy

KW - Diversity in the classroom and assisting students in transition

KW - Innovative programmes for enhancing intercultural competency and academic literacy

KW - Maori pedagogy

KW - Whole-ness literacy

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 1

EP - 6

BT - Sixth Biennial Conference

PB - Pearson Education

CY - Auckland NZ

ER -

Mlcek S. It is never just about 'literacy' and 'oracy': Different ways of communicating is the key to 'making meaning'. In Sixth Biennial Conference: Intercultural communication across university settings: Myths and realities. Auckland NZ: Pearson Education. 2008. p. 1-6