It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament

Kate Fenner, Georgina Caspar, Michelle Hyde, Cathrynne Henshall, Navneet Dhand, Fiona Probyn-Rapsey, Katherine Dashper, Andrew McLean, Paul McGreevy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We propose that the anthropomorphic application of gender stereotypes to animals influences human-animal interactions and human expectations, often with negative consequences for female animals. An online survey was conducted to explore riders’ perceptions of horse temperament and suitability for ridden work, based on horse sex. The questionnaire asked respondents to allocate three hypothetical horses (a mare, gelding and stallion) to four riders compromising a woman, man, girl and boy. Riders were described as equally capable of riding each horse and each horse was described as suitable for all riders. Participants were also asked which horses (mares, geldings or stallions) were most suitable for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate people’s perceptions about suitability of horse types for particular riders, to evaluate if age, strength or gender were important in rider choice and to investigate riders’ allocation of various descriptors to a gelding, stallion or mare. There were 1,233 survey respondents, 94% of whom were female and 75% of whom were riders with at least eight years of experience. Binomial logistic regression revealed the girl had 2.5 times the odds of being allocated the gelding compared to the boy (p < 0.001). Respondents were significantly more likely to allocate the stallion to the man and nearly 50% of respondents did not allocate a horse to the boy, even though they ranked rider gender as least important to their choice (p < 0.001). In a forced choice selection of a positive or negative descriptor from a series of nine paired terms to describe horse temperament, a greater proportion of respondents assigned geldings positive ratings on terms such as calm, trainable, reliable and predictable. In terms of suitability for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding, participants overwhelmingly chose geldings for trail-riding, with mares being least preferred for both dressage and show-jumping disciplines. The results suggest that female riders are entering the horse-human dyad with gendered ideas about horse temperament and view horse-riding as an activity primarily for women and girls. This could have far-reaching implications for equine training and welfare.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0216699
JournalPLoS One
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 May 2019

Fingerprint

temperament
Temperament
Horses
Animals
horses
geldings
Logistics
gender
stallions
mares
jumping
horse riding
human-animal relations
Logistic Models
stereotyped behavior
Surveys and Questionnaires
questionnaires

Cite this

Fenner, K., Caspar, G., Hyde, M., Henshall, C., Dhand, N., Probyn-Rapsey, F., ... McGreevy, P. (2019). It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament. PLoS One, 14(5), [e0216699]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216699
Fenner, Kate ; Caspar, Georgina ; Hyde, Michelle ; Henshall, Cathrynne ; Dhand, Navneet ; Probyn-Rapsey, Fiona ; Dashper, Katherine ; McLean, Andrew ; McGreevy, Paul. / It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament. In: PLoS One. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 5.
@article{dd95d10cb0224c89a5da2935b0632cfe,
title = "It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament",
abstract = "We propose that the anthropomorphic application of gender stereotypes to animals influences human-animal interactions and human expectations, often with negative consequences for female animals. An online survey was conducted to explore riders’ perceptions of horse temperament and suitability for ridden work, based on horse sex. The questionnaire asked respondents to allocate three hypothetical horses (a mare, gelding and stallion) to four riders compromising a woman, man, girl and boy. Riders were described as equally capable of riding each horse and each horse was described as suitable for all riders. Participants were also asked which horses (mares, geldings or stallions) were most suitable for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate people’s perceptions about suitability of horse types for particular riders, to evaluate if age, strength or gender were important in rider choice and to investigate riders’ allocation of various descriptors to a gelding, stallion or mare. There were 1,233 survey respondents, 94{\%} of whom were female and 75{\%} of whom were riders with at least eight years of experience. Binomial logistic regression revealed the girl had 2.5 times the odds of being allocated the gelding compared to the boy (p < 0.001). Respondents were significantly more likely to allocate the stallion to the man and nearly 50{\%} of respondents did not allocate a horse to the boy, even though they ranked rider gender as least important to their choice (p < 0.001). In a forced choice selection of a positive or negative descriptor from a series of nine paired terms to describe horse temperament, a greater proportion of respondents assigned geldings positive ratings on terms such as calm, trainable, reliable and predictable. In terms of suitability for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding, participants overwhelmingly chose geldings for trail-riding, with mares being least preferred for both dressage and show-jumping disciplines. The results suggest that female riders are entering the horse-human dyad with gendered ideas about horse temperament and view horse-riding as an activity primarily for women and girls. This could have far-reaching implications for equine training and welfare.",
author = "Kate Fenner and Georgina Caspar and Michelle Hyde and Cathrynne Henshall and Navneet Dhand and Fiona Probyn-Rapsey and Katherine Dashper and Andrew McLean and Paul McGreevy",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0216699",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science (PLoS)",
number = "5",

}

Fenner, K, Caspar, G, Hyde, M, Henshall, C, Dhand, N, Probyn-Rapsey, F, Dashper, K, McLean, A & McGreevy, P 2019, 'It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament', PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 5, e0216699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216699

It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament. / Fenner, Kate; Caspar, Georgina; Hyde, Michelle; Henshall, Cathrynne; Dhand, Navneet; Probyn-Rapsey, Fiona; Dashper, Katherine; McLean, Andrew; McGreevy, Paul.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 14, No. 5, e0216699, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - It’s all about the sex, or is it? Humans, horses and temperament

AU - Fenner, Kate

AU - Caspar, Georgina

AU - Hyde, Michelle

AU - Henshall, Cathrynne

AU - Dhand, Navneet

AU - Probyn-Rapsey, Fiona

AU - Dashper, Katherine

AU - McLean, Andrew

AU - McGreevy, Paul

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - We propose that the anthropomorphic application of gender stereotypes to animals influences human-animal interactions and human expectations, often with negative consequences for female animals. An online survey was conducted to explore riders’ perceptions of horse temperament and suitability for ridden work, based on horse sex. The questionnaire asked respondents to allocate three hypothetical horses (a mare, gelding and stallion) to four riders compromising a woman, man, girl and boy. Riders were described as equally capable of riding each horse and each horse was described as suitable for all riders. Participants were also asked which horses (mares, geldings or stallions) were most suitable for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate people’s perceptions about suitability of horse types for particular riders, to evaluate if age, strength or gender were important in rider choice and to investigate riders’ allocation of various descriptors to a gelding, stallion or mare. There were 1,233 survey respondents, 94% of whom were female and 75% of whom were riders with at least eight years of experience. Binomial logistic regression revealed the girl had 2.5 times the odds of being allocated the gelding compared to the boy (p < 0.001). Respondents were significantly more likely to allocate the stallion to the man and nearly 50% of respondents did not allocate a horse to the boy, even though they ranked rider gender as least important to their choice (p < 0.001). In a forced choice selection of a positive or negative descriptor from a series of nine paired terms to describe horse temperament, a greater proportion of respondents assigned geldings positive ratings on terms such as calm, trainable, reliable and predictable. In terms of suitability for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding, participants overwhelmingly chose geldings for trail-riding, with mares being least preferred for both dressage and show-jumping disciplines. The results suggest that female riders are entering the horse-human dyad with gendered ideas about horse temperament and view horse-riding as an activity primarily for women and girls. This could have far-reaching implications for equine training and welfare.

AB - We propose that the anthropomorphic application of gender stereotypes to animals influences human-animal interactions and human expectations, often with negative consequences for female animals. An online survey was conducted to explore riders’ perceptions of horse temperament and suitability for ridden work, based on horse sex. The questionnaire asked respondents to allocate three hypothetical horses (a mare, gelding and stallion) to four riders compromising a woman, man, girl and boy. Riders were described as equally capable of riding each horse and each horse was described as suitable for all riders. Participants were also asked which horses (mares, geldings or stallions) were most suitable for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate people’s perceptions about suitability of horse types for particular riders, to evaluate if age, strength or gender were important in rider choice and to investigate riders’ allocation of various descriptors to a gelding, stallion or mare. There were 1,233 survey respondents, 94% of whom were female and 75% of whom were riders with at least eight years of experience. Binomial logistic regression revealed the girl had 2.5 times the odds of being allocated the gelding compared to the boy (p < 0.001). Respondents were significantly more likely to allocate the stallion to the man and nearly 50% of respondents did not allocate a horse to the boy, even though they ranked rider gender as least important to their choice (p < 0.001). In a forced choice selection of a positive or negative descriptor from a series of nine paired terms to describe horse temperament, a greater proportion of respondents assigned geldings positive ratings on terms such as calm, trainable, reliable and predictable. In terms of suitability for the three equestrian disciplines of show-jumping, dressage and trail-riding, participants overwhelmingly chose geldings for trail-riding, with mares being least preferred for both dressage and show-jumping disciplines. The results suggest that female riders are entering the horse-human dyad with gendered ideas about horse temperament and view horse-riding as an activity primarily for women and girls. This could have far-reaching implications for equine training and welfare.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065817219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065817219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0216699

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - e0216699

ER -