Journal ratings and the publications of Australian academics

Brian Hemmings, Russell Kay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Journal ranking systems are becoming more commonplace and receiving increasedattention from academics and their senior managers. The study reported below wasdesigned to examine the relationship between particular background factors (e.g.,gender and qualifications) of academics and the rankings of what they perceived astheir most significant refereed journal publication. Survey data were gathered fromacademics employed at two Australian universities and these data were analysedusing a variety of nonparametric statistical procedures. The results demonstrated that:1) less than half of these academics nominated a publication ranked in the top 20% ofjournals in their respective field of research; 2) academics who had published greaternumbers of journal articles were more likely to have higher rated publications; 3)more senior academics were more likely to publish in the higher-rated journals thantheir junior counterparts; and, 4) academics with doctorates were much more likely toidentify an article published in the highest rated journals. The implications of theseresults for higher education practice are considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-243
Number of pages10
JournalIssues in Educational Research
Volume20
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

rating
ranking
statistical method
qualification
manager
university
gender
education

Cite this

@article{4b84086acd964343a4c863e137e2fd7d,
title = "Journal ratings and the publications of Australian academics",
abstract = "Journal ranking systems are becoming more commonplace and receiving increasedattention from academics and their senior managers. The study reported below wasdesigned to examine the relationship between particular background factors (e.g.,gender and qualifications) of academics and the rankings of what they perceived astheir most significant refereed journal publication. Survey data were gathered fromacademics employed at two Australian universities and these data were analysedusing a variety of nonparametric statistical procedures. The results demonstrated that:1) less than half of these academics nominated a publication ranked in the top 20{\%} ofjournals in their respective field of research; 2) academics who had published greaternumbers of journal articles were more likely to have higher rated publications; 3)more senior academics were more likely to publish in the higher-rated journals thantheir junior counterparts; and, 4) academics with doctorates were much more likely toidentify an article published in the highest rated journals. The implications of theseresults for higher education practice are considered.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Higher education, Publication, Publish or perish issues",
author = "Brian Hemmings and Russell Kay",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Issues in Educational Research. ISSNs: 1837-6290;",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "234--243",
journal = "Issues in Educational Research",
issn = "1837-6290",
publisher = "Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Journal ratings and the publications of Australian academics. / Hemmings, Brian; Kay, Russell.

In: Issues in Educational Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2010, p. 234-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Journal ratings and the publications of Australian academics

AU - Hemmings, Brian

AU - Kay, Russell

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Issues in Educational Research. ISSNs: 1837-6290;

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Journal ranking systems are becoming more commonplace and receiving increasedattention from academics and their senior managers. The study reported below wasdesigned to examine the relationship between particular background factors (e.g.,gender and qualifications) of academics and the rankings of what they perceived astheir most significant refereed journal publication. Survey data were gathered fromacademics employed at two Australian universities and these data were analysedusing a variety of nonparametric statistical procedures. The results demonstrated that:1) less than half of these academics nominated a publication ranked in the top 20% ofjournals in their respective field of research; 2) academics who had published greaternumbers of journal articles were more likely to have higher rated publications; 3)more senior academics were more likely to publish in the higher-rated journals thantheir junior counterparts; and, 4) academics with doctorates were much more likely toidentify an article published in the highest rated journals. The implications of theseresults for higher education practice are considered.

AB - Journal ranking systems are becoming more commonplace and receiving increasedattention from academics and their senior managers. The study reported below wasdesigned to examine the relationship between particular background factors (e.g.,gender and qualifications) of academics and the rankings of what they perceived astheir most significant refereed journal publication. Survey data were gathered fromacademics employed at two Australian universities and these data were analysedusing a variety of nonparametric statistical procedures. The results demonstrated that:1) less than half of these academics nominated a publication ranked in the top 20% ofjournals in their respective field of research; 2) academics who had published greaternumbers of journal articles were more likely to have higher rated publications; 3)more senior academics were more likely to publish in the higher-rated journals thantheir junior counterparts; and, 4) academics with doctorates were much more likely toidentify an article published in the highest rated journals. The implications of theseresults for higher education practice are considered.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Higher education

KW - Publication

KW - Publish or perish issues

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 234

EP - 243

JO - Issues in Educational Research

JF - Issues in Educational Research

SN - 1837-6290

IS - 3

ER -