TY - JOUR
T1 - Karika koja nedostaje izmedu genotipa, fenotipa i kliničkih nalaza
AU - Lippi, Giuseppe
AU - Favaloro, Emmanuel J.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Due to outstanding scientific and technological progresses, the number of genetic tests is growing exponentially in clinical laboratories, supported by relatively inexpensive, fast, reliable, high-throughput techniques. It is unquestionable that genetic testing has helped to identify the molecular bases of monogenic disorders as well as a variety of genes involved in most mul-tifactorial pathologies. This in turn has allowed for personalized treatments and pharmacological therapies. However, it has also produced a paradox in the managed care of patients, in that genetic testing is now often perceived as a panacea, with assumptions that each single genetic polymorphism is associated with a specific, individual phenotype and/or clinical picture. Unfortunately, several processes regulating protein expression are still unknown, and their biological background has not been definitely recognized, so that the link between the genotype, the phenotype and the clinics is not always obvious, and it is often even more challenging to address how much the link between genes and environment will impact on the managed care of the patients. The present article aims to critically review the complex and multifaceted relationship linking genes, biochemistry and clinics, highlighting advantages and drawbacks of genetic testing in monogenic disorders, po-lygenic pathology and in the prediction of the pharmacological response.
AB - Due to outstanding scientific and technological progresses, the number of genetic tests is growing exponentially in clinical laboratories, supported by relatively inexpensive, fast, reliable, high-throughput techniques. It is unquestionable that genetic testing has helped to identify the molecular bases of monogenic disorders as well as a variety of genes involved in most mul-tifactorial pathologies. This in turn has allowed for personalized treatments and pharmacological therapies. However, it has also produced a paradox in the managed care of patients, in that genetic testing is now often perceived as a panacea, with assumptions that each single genetic polymorphism is associated with a specific, individual phenotype and/or clinical picture. Unfortunately, several processes regulating protein expression are still unknown, and their biological background has not been definitely recognized, so that the link between the genotype, the phenotype and the clinics is not always obvious, and it is often even more challenging to address how much the link between genes and environment will impact on the managed care of the patients. The present article aims to critically review the complex and multifaceted relationship linking genes, biochemistry and clinics, highlighting advantages and drawbacks of genetic testing in monogenic disorders, po-lygenic pathology and in the prediction of the pharmacological response.
KW - Clinics
KW - Genetic testing
KW - Genotype
KW - Phenotype
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649171019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649171019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11613/bm.2009.013
DO - 10.11613/bm.2009.013
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:67649171019
SN - 1330-0962
VL - 19
SP - 137
EP - 145
JO - Biochemia Medica
JF - Biochemia Medica
IS - 2
ER -