Landcare in Australia: burned out and browned off

Ian Byron, Allan Curtis

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Australia has relied heavily on voluntary approaches to managing critical natural resource issues. Community Landcare groups are an important element of this strategy and have been widely acclaimed as an Australian success story. Landcare group activity has mobilised a large cross-section of the rural community and contributed to improved resource management. These volunteer groups are now an important delivery mechanism for on-the-ground work funded through large government programmes, including the billion dollar Natural Heritage Trust. At the same time, research reported in this paper suggests that government cuts to extension staff supporting Landcare and ongoing management issues are contributing to burn-out of group members and are undermining group effectiveness. Australia may be nearing the limits of voluntary approaches to natural resource management. At the very least, there needs to be more coherent, professional management of Landcare.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)311-326
    Number of pages16
    JournalLocal Environment
    Volume6
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Landcare in Australia: burned out and browned off'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this