TY - JOUR
T1 - Language intervention in French-English bilingual aphasia
T2 - Evidence of limited therapy transfer
AU - Miller Amberber, Amanda
PY - 2012/11/1
Y1 - 2012/11/1
N2 - This study investigated the effect of treatment in the second language (L2) for a previously proficient French-English bilingual with aphasia, at 5 years post-stroke. Assessment on the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) enabled objective measurement of language skills in each language, and comparison across languages, before and after treatment in L2 (English). Previous therapy had been provided exclusively in L1 (French). Pre-treatment assessment on the BAT revealed greater impairment in L2 than L1, indicating differential recovery and limited transfer from previous L1 intervention. Following treatment, re-assessment on the BAT in French and English showed significant gains in spoken expression and syntactic comprehension in L2 but not L1. Translation in both directions was unchanged. Gains in L2 did not exceed L1 pre-treatment scores. These results demonstrate language-specific improvement following treatment in L2, and indicate caution in assuming therapy transfer will occur in proficient, highly motivated late bilinguals. The use of the BAT as a cross-linguistically valid assessment tool is recommended for future bilingual aphasia research.
AB - This study investigated the effect of treatment in the second language (L2) for a previously proficient French-English bilingual with aphasia, at 5 years post-stroke. Assessment on the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) enabled objective measurement of language skills in each language, and comparison across languages, before and after treatment in L2 (English). Previous therapy had been provided exclusively in L1 (French). Pre-treatment assessment on the BAT revealed greater impairment in L2 than L1, indicating differential recovery and limited transfer from previous L1 intervention. Following treatment, re-assessment on the BAT in French and English showed significant gains in spoken expression and syntactic comprehension in L2 but not L1. Translation in both directions was unchanged. Gains in L2 did not exceed L1 pre-treatment scores. These results demonstrate language-specific improvement following treatment in L2, and indicate caution in assuming therapy transfer will occur in proficient, highly motivated late bilinguals. The use of the BAT as a cross-linguistically valid assessment tool is recommended for future bilingual aphasia research.
KW - BAT
KW - Bilingual aphasia
KW - Cross-linguistic assessment
KW - Generalisation
KW - Therapy transfer
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866616895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866616895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.10.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84866616895
SN - 0911-6044
VL - 25
SP - 588
EP - 614
JO - Journal of Neurolinguistics
JF - Journal of Neurolinguistics
IS - 6
ER -