TY - JOUR
T1 - Learner-facing learning analytic – Feedback and motivation
T2 - A critique
AU - Maag, Anelika
AU - Withana, Chandana
AU - Budhathoki, Srijana
AU - Alsadoon, Abeer
AU - VO, Trung Hung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Data analysis to guide the design and deployment of learning experiences has been in use in educational institutions for decades. While this has made it possible to predict retention, flags students at risk and more clearly assesses performance across a range of indicators, few benefits visible to students have resulted. Recent attempts to design learner-facing analytics seem to also have met with indifferent results as they appear to have neglected to focus on student personality and motivation or to train students appropriately to decipher LA-based feedback. The aim of this study is to investigate why current Learning Analytics (LA) systems have so little impact on student motivation. A further goal has been to scrutinize the latest research for potential grounding in theoretical concepts generally – but with emphasis on motivation. Results show that, with few exceptions, neither instructor- nor learner-facing LA currently in use at universities take into consideration student personalities as neither are grounded in appropriate theory. This study contributes to the field of LA and Motivation by providing a clear (if bleak) picture of the lack of focus on student personality and motivation in terms of LA feedback. It is, therefore, timely that to remind the research community that an understanding of the learner's personality, attributes, and sources of motivation is central to the effectiveness of any feedback design. We see this paper as a starting point for a much-needed deeper discussion.
AB - Data analysis to guide the design and deployment of learning experiences has been in use in educational institutions for decades. While this has made it possible to predict retention, flags students at risk and more clearly assesses performance across a range of indicators, few benefits visible to students have resulted. Recent attempts to design learner-facing analytics seem to also have met with indifferent results as they appear to have neglected to focus on student personality and motivation or to train students appropriately to decipher LA-based feedback. The aim of this study is to investigate why current Learning Analytics (LA) systems have so little impact on student motivation. A further goal has been to scrutinize the latest research for potential grounding in theoretical concepts generally – but with emphasis on motivation. Results show that, with few exceptions, neither instructor- nor learner-facing LA currently in use at universities take into consideration student personalities as neither are grounded in appropriate theory. This study contributes to the field of LA and Motivation by providing a clear (if bleak) picture of the lack of focus on student personality and motivation in terms of LA feedback. It is, therefore, timely that to remind the research community that an understanding of the learner's personality, attributes, and sources of motivation is central to the effectiveness of any feedback design. We see this paper as a starting point for a much-needed deeper discussion.
KW - Hybrid
KW - Learning analytics
KW - Learning style
KW - Personality style
KW - Theory of learning analytics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120752834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120752834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101764
DO - 10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101764
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85120752834
SN - 0023-9690
VL - 77
JO - Learning and Motivation
JF - Learning and Motivation
M1 - 101764
ER -