Learning to Classify: Online Versus Printed Dewey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Two versions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme were offered as options to distance education students at Charles Sturt University (CSU) as the basis for their study and eventual application of it; the traditional printed version and the new online version called WebDewey. Students were provided with the same supporting materials. A study was carried out to examine whether the students' use of a particular version of DDC affected their learning. Despite the author 's concerns about teaching elementary classification using the online version, no significant difference in performance between students who used WebDewey and students who used the printed volumes was found, although on the average the sample using the latter did perform a little better in the assessment. Neither were significant differences in aspects of DDC classification found. Nevertheless, the conclusions may not hold true for other online products, nor for other educational contexts, and educators must take care to consider each product 's effectiveness as a teaching medium, irrespective of the current trend in favour of online materials. In any case, a revision of supporting materials when an online product replaces a printed one may well be worthwhile.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-25
    Number of pages11
    JournalMalaysian Journal of Library and Information Science
    Volume9
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    learning
    student
    Teaching
    educator
    trend
    performance
    education

    Cite this

    @article{bac46439e0cb4b8a886a1d3573c26d1f,
    title = "Learning to Classify: Online Versus Printed Dewey",
    abstract = "Two versions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme were offered as options to distance education students at Charles Sturt University (CSU) as the basis for their study and eventual application of it; the traditional printed version and the new online version called WebDewey. Students were provided with the same supporting materials. A study was carried out to examine whether the students' use of a particular version of DDC affected their learning. Despite the author 's concerns about teaching elementary classification using the online version, no significant difference in performance between students who used WebDewey and students who used the printed volumes was found, although on the average the sample using the latter did perform a little better in the assessment. Neither were significant differences in aspects of DDC classification found. Nevertheless, the conclusions may not hold true for other online products, nor for other educational contexts, and educators must take care to consider each product 's effectiveness as a teaching medium, irrespective of the current trend in favour of online materials. In any case, a revision of supporting materials when an online product replaces a printed one may well be worthwhile.",
    keywords = "Open access version available",
    author = "Philip Hider",
    note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. ISSNs: 1394-6234;",
    year = "2004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "15--25",
    journal = "Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science",
    issn = "1394-6234",
    publisher = "Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology",
    number = "1",

    }

    Learning to Classify : Online Versus Printed Dewey. / Hider, Philip.

    In: Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2004, p. 15-25.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Learning to Classify

    T2 - Online Versus Printed Dewey

    AU - Hider, Philip

    N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. ISSNs: 1394-6234;

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - Two versions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme were offered as options to distance education students at Charles Sturt University (CSU) as the basis for their study and eventual application of it; the traditional printed version and the new online version called WebDewey. Students were provided with the same supporting materials. A study was carried out to examine whether the students' use of a particular version of DDC affected their learning. Despite the author 's concerns about teaching elementary classification using the online version, no significant difference in performance between students who used WebDewey and students who used the printed volumes was found, although on the average the sample using the latter did perform a little better in the assessment. Neither were significant differences in aspects of DDC classification found. Nevertheless, the conclusions may not hold true for other online products, nor for other educational contexts, and educators must take care to consider each product 's effectiveness as a teaching medium, irrespective of the current trend in favour of online materials. In any case, a revision of supporting materials when an online product replaces a printed one may well be worthwhile.

    AB - Two versions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) scheme were offered as options to distance education students at Charles Sturt University (CSU) as the basis for their study and eventual application of it; the traditional printed version and the new online version called WebDewey. Students were provided with the same supporting materials. A study was carried out to examine whether the students' use of a particular version of DDC affected their learning. Despite the author 's concerns about teaching elementary classification using the online version, no significant difference in performance between students who used WebDewey and students who used the printed volumes was found, although on the average the sample using the latter did perform a little better in the assessment. Neither were significant differences in aspects of DDC classification found. Nevertheless, the conclusions may not hold true for other online products, nor for other educational contexts, and educators must take care to consider each product 's effectiveness as a teaching medium, irrespective of the current trend in favour of online materials. In any case, a revision of supporting materials when an online product replaces a printed one may well be worthwhile.

    KW - Open access version available

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 15

    EP - 25

    JO - Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science

    JF - Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science

    SN - 1394-6234

    IS - 1

    ER -