TY - JOUR
T1 - Making space for community critical methodology
T2 - Stories from the Australian context
AU - Fox, Rachael
AU - Nic Giolla Easpaig, Bróna
AU - Watson, Lester
PY - 2019/1/25
Y1 - 2019/1/25
N2 - Our collective account considers the ways community critical methodologies can inform academic endeavors. Methodology is understood to be the theorizing of methods that produce and legitimate knowledge claims. For us, community critical approaches incorporate poststructural and other forms of critical theory in the questioning of taken for granted assumptions. This forms a valuable foundation for community praxis as it focuses not just on social issues outside, but on an examination within; on the institution of psychology itself. We find “examining within” a vital process for our research, teaching, and community engagement. Above all it is important to ask whose interests are served by the construction and presentation of knowledge in particular ways. We present three pieces of practice which engaged with critical methodologies. The first examines collaborative research methodologies developed with young people in rural Australia who are primary carers for a family member. The second examines tensions involved in trying to employ critical methodologies in multi-stakeholder work between community organizations, communities, and researchers. The third examines opportunities and barriers when employing critical methodologies in learning and teaching with undergraduate students. We reflect upon the intersecting threads of commonality and difference between them and consider the implications for practice.
AB - Our collective account considers the ways community critical methodologies can inform academic endeavors. Methodology is understood to be the theorizing of methods that produce and legitimate knowledge claims. For us, community critical approaches incorporate poststructural and other forms of critical theory in the questioning of taken for granted assumptions. This forms a valuable foundation for community praxis as it focuses not just on social issues outside, but on an examination within; on the institution of psychology itself. We find “examining within” a vital process for our research, teaching, and community engagement. Above all it is important to ask whose interests are served by the construction and presentation of knowledge in particular ways. We present three pieces of practice which engaged with critical methodologies. The first examines collaborative research methodologies developed with young people in rural Australia who are primary carers for a family member. The second examines tensions involved in trying to employ critical methodologies in multi-stakeholder work between community organizations, communities, and researchers. The third examines opportunities and barriers when employing critical methodologies in learning and teaching with undergraduate students. We reflect upon the intersecting threads of commonality and difference between them and consider the implications for practice.
KW - Community psychology
KW - Critical psychology
KW - Critical theory
KW - Methodology
KW - Poststructuralism
KW - Praxis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060568137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060568137&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajcp.12302
DO - 10.1002/ajcp.12302
M3 - Article
C2 - 30681734
AN - SCOPUS:85060568137
SN - 0091-0562
VL - 63
SP - 227
EP - 238
JO - American Journal of Community Psychology
JF - American Journal of Community Psychology
ER -