TY - JOUR
T1 - Marine waters assessment using improved water quality model incorporating machine learning approaches
AU - Uddin, Md Galal
AU - Rahman, Azizur
AU - Nash, Stephen
AU - Diganta, Mir Talas Mahammad
AU - Sajib, Abdul Majed
AU - Moniruzzaman, Md
AU - Olbert, Agnieszka I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/10/15
Y1 - 2023/10/15
N2 - In marine ecosystems, both living and non-living organisms depend on “good” water quality. It depends on a number of factors, and one of the most important is the quality of the water. The water quality index (WQI) model is widely used to assess water quality, but existing models have uncertainty issues. To address this, the authors introduced two new WQI models: the weight based weighted quadratic mean (WQM) and unweighted based root mean squared (RMS) models. These models were used to assess water quality in the Bay of Bengal, using seven water quality indicators including salinity (SAL), temperature (TEMP), pH, transparency (TRAN), dissolved oxygen (DOX), total oxidized nitrogen (TON), and molybdate reactive phosphorus (MRP). Both models ranked water quality between “good” and “fair” categories, with no significant difference between the weighted and unweighted models’ results. The models showed considerable variation in the computed WQI scores, ranging from 68 to 88 with an average of 75 for WQM and 70 to 76 with an average of 72 for RMS. The models did not have any issues with sub-index or aggregation functions, and both had a high level of sensitivity (R2 = 1) in terms of the spatio-temporal resolution of waterbodies. The study demonstrated that both WQI approaches effectively assessed marine waters, reducing uncertainty and improving the accuracy of the WQI score.
AB - In marine ecosystems, both living and non-living organisms depend on “good” water quality. It depends on a number of factors, and one of the most important is the quality of the water. The water quality index (WQI) model is widely used to assess water quality, but existing models have uncertainty issues. To address this, the authors introduced two new WQI models: the weight based weighted quadratic mean (WQM) and unweighted based root mean squared (RMS) models. These models were used to assess water quality in the Bay of Bengal, using seven water quality indicators including salinity (SAL), temperature (TEMP), pH, transparency (TRAN), dissolved oxygen (DOX), total oxidized nitrogen (TON), and molybdate reactive phosphorus (MRP). Both models ranked water quality between “good” and “fair” categories, with no significant difference between the weighted and unweighted models’ results. The models showed considerable variation in the computed WQI scores, ranging from 68 to 88 with an average of 75 for WQM and 70 to 76 with an average of 72 for RMS. The models did not have any issues with sub-index or aggregation functions, and both had a high level of sensitivity (R2 = 1) in terms of the spatio-temporal resolution of waterbodies. The study demonstrated that both WQI approaches effectively assessed marine waters, reducing uncertainty and improving the accuracy of the WQI score.
KW - Bay of Bengal
KW - Eclipsing and ambiguity problems
KW - Marine waters
KW - Model sensitivity
KW - Unweighted WQI model
KW - Weighted WQI model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162988385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85162988385&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118368
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118368
M3 - Article
C2 - 37364491
AN - SCOPUS:85162988385
SN - 1095-8630
VL - 344
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
M1 - 118368
ER -