Abstract
Objective: This paper explores the impact and mechanisms for successful implementation of a speech language pathology assistant (SLPA) role into a rehabilitation setting using a traineeship approach.
Methods: Multiple data sources were used, including interviews with key stakeholders, documentary evidence and a workload audit.
Results: The SLPA role increased clinical service capacity by 28 h per week across the service and required a total of 3 h per week of supervision input (the equivalent of 38 min per speech and language pathologist (SLP)). The SLPA used non-clinical time for training and administration. Mechanisms that facilitated the implementation of the SLPA role were: support for existing staff; formal knowledge and skills in training; consultation and engagement; access to a competency framework; close working with the registered training organisation; clearly defined role and delegation boundaries; clear supervision structures; confidence in own role; supportive organisational culture; vision for expansion of the role; engaging the SLPs in training and development; and a targeted recruitment approach.
Conclusion The development and implementation of a new trainee SLPA role using a traineeship approach required a large amount of supervision and training input from the SLPs. However, it was perceived that these efforts were offset by the increased service capacity provided by the introduction of a trainee role and the high levels of satisfaction with the new role.
Methods: Multiple data sources were used, including interviews with key stakeholders, documentary evidence and a workload audit.
Results: The SLPA role increased clinical service capacity by 28 h per week across the service and required a total of 3 h per week of supervision input (the equivalent of 38 min per speech and language pathologist (SLP)). The SLPA used non-clinical time for training and administration. Mechanisms that facilitated the implementation of the SLPA role were: support for existing staff; formal knowledge and skills in training; consultation and engagement; access to a competency framework; close working with the registered training organisation; clearly defined role and delegation boundaries; clear supervision structures; confidence in own role; supportive organisational culture; vision for expansion of the role; engaging the SLPs in training and development; and a targeted recruitment approach.
Conclusion The development and implementation of a new trainee SLPA role using a traineeship approach required a large amount of supervision and training input from the SLPs. However, it was perceived that these efforts were offset by the increased service capacity provided by the introduction of a trainee role and the high levels of satisfaction with the new role.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 101-108 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Australian Health Review |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |