TY - JOUR
T1 - Millennial researchers in a metric-driven scholarly world
T2 - An international study
AU - Nicholas, David
AU - Herman, Eti
AU - Jamali Mahmuei, Hamid R.
AU - Abrizah, Abdullah
AU - Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa
AU - Xu, Jie
AU - Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca
AU - Watkinson, Anthony
AU - Polezhaeva, Tatiana
AU - Świgon, Marzena
N1 - Includes bibliographical references
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - The study Investigates the attitudes and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) in regard to citation-based metrics and altmetrics, providing the findings in the light of what might be expected of the millennial generation and in the context of what we already know about researchers in today’s ‘culture of counting’ governed scholarly world. The data were gathered by means of an international survey, informed by a preceding, 3-year qualitative study of 120 ECRs from 7 countries, which obtained 1,600 responses. The main conclusions are: 1, citation indicators play a central and multi-purpose role in scholarly communications; 2, altmetrics are not so popular or widely used, but ECRs are waking up to some of their merits, most notably, discovering the extent to which their papers obtain traction and monitoring impact; 3, there is a strong likelihood that ECRs are going to have to grapple with both citation-based metrics and altmetrics, mainly in order to demonstrate research impact; 4, the Chinese are the most metric using nation, largely because of governmental regulations.
AB - The study Investigates the attitudes and practices of early career researchers (ECRs) in regard to citation-based metrics and altmetrics, providing the findings in the light of what might be expected of the millennial generation and in the context of what we already know about researchers in today’s ‘culture of counting’ governed scholarly world. The data were gathered by means of an international survey, informed by a preceding, 3-year qualitative study of 120 ECRs from 7 countries, which obtained 1,600 responses. The main conclusions are: 1, citation indicators play a central and multi-purpose role in scholarly communications; 2, altmetrics are not so popular or widely used, but ECRs are waking up to some of their merits, most notably, discovering the extent to which their papers obtain traction and monitoring impact; 3, there is a strong likelihood that ECRs are going to have to grapple with both citation-based metrics and altmetrics, mainly in order to demonstrate research impact; 4, the Chinese are the most metric using nation, largely because of governmental regulations.
KW - Scholarly metrics
KW - Scholarly communications
KW - Early career researchers
KW - Millennials
U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvaa004
DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvaa004
M3 - Article
SN - 0958-2029
VL - 29
SP - 263
EP - 274
JO - Research Evaluation
JF - Research Evaluation
IS - 3
ER -