Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning

Alex Mark Lechner, Greg Brown, Christopher Raymond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Recent papers on the spatial assessment of conservation opportunity have focused on how social values for conservation may change modeled conservation outcomes. Accounting for social factors is important for regional wildlife corridor initiatives as they often emphasize the collaborative aspects of conservation planning.Objectives: We present an approach for characterizing the potential effects of public conservation orientation and projected future development land use scenarios on landscape connectivity.Methods: Using public participation GIS techniques (mail-based surveys linked to a mapping component), we classified spatially explicit conservation values and preferences into a conservation orientation index consisting of positive, negative, or neutral scores. Connectivity was then modeled using a least-cost path and graph-network approach for a range of conservation orientation and development scenarios in the Lower Hunter region, Australia. Scenarios were modelled through either adding vegetation (positive orientation) or removing vegetation (negative orientation, development).Results: Scenarios that included positive conservation orientation link the isolated eastern and western reaches of the Lower Hunter, even when negative conservation scores were included in the model. This outcome is consistent with proposed connectivity corridors identified in regional strategies. The development scenario showed connectivity patterns similar to only modelling negative conservation orientation scores, with greater fragmentation across the region.Conclusions: The modeled outcomes showed consistency between the public's conservation orientation and the ecological rationale for increasing connectivity within the region. If conservation orientation can be translated into conservation initiatives, the result will be enhanced regional landscape connectivity that is both ecologically beneficial, as well as socially acceptable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)699-713
Number of pages15
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

conservation planning
connectivity
conservation
planning
modeling
scenario
public
vegetation
fragmentation
social factors
Values
Geographical Information System
GIS
land use

Cite this

Lechner, Alex Mark ; Brown, Greg ; Raymond, Christopher. / Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning. In: Landscape Ecology. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 699-713.
@article{2b329537ecae482297e9c7942b04e203,
title = "Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning",
abstract = "Context: Recent papers on the spatial assessment of conservation opportunity have focused on how social values for conservation may change modeled conservation outcomes. Accounting for social factors is important for regional wildlife corridor initiatives as they often emphasize the collaborative aspects of conservation planning.Objectives: We present an approach for characterizing the potential effects of public conservation orientation and projected future development land use scenarios on landscape connectivity.Methods: Using public participation GIS techniques (mail-based surveys linked to a mapping component), we classified spatially explicit conservation values and preferences into a conservation orientation index consisting of positive, negative, or neutral scores. Connectivity was then modeled using a least-cost path and graph-network approach for a range of conservation orientation and development scenarios in the Lower Hunter region, Australia. Scenarios were modelled through either adding vegetation (positive orientation) or removing vegetation (negative orientation, development).Results: Scenarios that included positive conservation orientation link the isolated eastern and western reaches of the Lower Hunter, even when negative conservation scores were included in the model. This outcome is consistent with proposed connectivity corridors identified in regional strategies. The development scenario showed connectivity patterns similar to only modelling negative conservation orientation scores, with greater fragmentation across the region.Conclusions: The modeled outcomes showed consistency between the public's conservation orientation and the ecological rationale for increasing connectivity within the region. If conservation orientation can be translated into conservation initiatives, the result will be enhanced regional landscape connectivity that is both ecologically beneficial, as well as socially acceptable.",
keywords = "Graph theory, Land use planning, Least-cost paths, Public participation GIS, social research, connectivity, dispersal, Scenario planning, Urbanization, Conservation planning",
author = "Lechner, {Alex Mark} and Greg Brown and Christopher Raymond",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10980-015-0153-0",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "699--713",
journal = "Landscape Ecology",
issn = "0921-2973",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning. / Lechner, Alex Mark; Brown, Greg; Raymond, Christopher.

In: Landscape Ecology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 04.2015, p. 699-713.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning

AU - Lechner, Alex Mark

AU - Brown, Greg

AU - Raymond, Christopher

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - Context: Recent papers on the spatial assessment of conservation opportunity have focused on how social values for conservation may change modeled conservation outcomes. Accounting for social factors is important for regional wildlife corridor initiatives as they often emphasize the collaborative aspects of conservation planning.Objectives: We present an approach for characterizing the potential effects of public conservation orientation and projected future development land use scenarios on landscape connectivity.Methods: Using public participation GIS techniques (mail-based surveys linked to a mapping component), we classified spatially explicit conservation values and preferences into a conservation orientation index consisting of positive, negative, or neutral scores. Connectivity was then modeled using a least-cost path and graph-network approach for a range of conservation orientation and development scenarios in the Lower Hunter region, Australia. Scenarios were modelled through either adding vegetation (positive orientation) or removing vegetation (negative orientation, development).Results: Scenarios that included positive conservation orientation link the isolated eastern and western reaches of the Lower Hunter, even when negative conservation scores were included in the model. This outcome is consistent with proposed connectivity corridors identified in regional strategies. The development scenario showed connectivity patterns similar to only modelling negative conservation orientation scores, with greater fragmentation across the region.Conclusions: The modeled outcomes showed consistency between the public's conservation orientation and the ecological rationale for increasing connectivity within the region. If conservation orientation can be translated into conservation initiatives, the result will be enhanced regional landscape connectivity that is both ecologically beneficial, as well as socially acceptable.

AB - Context: Recent papers on the spatial assessment of conservation opportunity have focused on how social values for conservation may change modeled conservation outcomes. Accounting for social factors is important for regional wildlife corridor initiatives as they often emphasize the collaborative aspects of conservation planning.Objectives: We present an approach for characterizing the potential effects of public conservation orientation and projected future development land use scenarios on landscape connectivity.Methods: Using public participation GIS techniques (mail-based surveys linked to a mapping component), we classified spatially explicit conservation values and preferences into a conservation orientation index consisting of positive, negative, or neutral scores. Connectivity was then modeled using a least-cost path and graph-network approach for a range of conservation orientation and development scenarios in the Lower Hunter region, Australia. Scenarios were modelled through either adding vegetation (positive orientation) or removing vegetation (negative orientation, development).Results: Scenarios that included positive conservation orientation link the isolated eastern and western reaches of the Lower Hunter, even when negative conservation scores were included in the model. This outcome is consistent with proposed connectivity corridors identified in regional strategies. The development scenario showed connectivity patterns similar to only modelling negative conservation orientation scores, with greater fragmentation across the region.Conclusions: The modeled outcomes showed consistency between the public's conservation orientation and the ecological rationale for increasing connectivity within the region. If conservation orientation can be translated into conservation initiatives, the result will be enhanced regional landscape connectivity that is both ecologically beneficial, as well as socially acceptable.

KW - Graph theory

KW - Land use planning

KW - Least-cost paths

KW - Public participation GIS, social research, connectivity, dispersal

KW - Scenario planning

KW - Urbanization

KW - Conservation planning

U2 - 10.1007/s10980-015-0153-0

DO - 10.1007/s10980-015-0153-0

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 699

EP - 713

JO - Landscape Ecology

JF - Landscape Ecology

SN - 0921-2973

IS - 4

ER -