TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling the effects of cold temperature during the reproductive stage on the yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
AU - Anwar, Muhuddin Rajin
AU - Luckett, David J
AU - Chauhan, Yashvir S
AU - Ip, Ryan H L
AU - Maphosa, Lancelot
AU - Simpson, Marja
AU - Warren, Annie
AU - Raman, Rosy
AU - Richards, Mark F
AU - Pengilley, Georgina
AU - Hobson, Kristy
AU - Graham, Neroli
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - During the
reproductive stage, chilling temperatures and frost reduce the yield of
chickpea and limit its adaptation. The adverse effects of chilling
temperature and frost in terms of the threshold temperatures, impact of
cold duration, and genotype-by-environment-by-management interactions
are not well quantified. Crop growth models that predict flowering time
and yield under diverse climates can identify combinations of cultivars
and sowing time to reduce frost risk in target environments. The
Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM-chickpea) model uses
daily temperatures to model basic crop growth but does not include
penalties for either frost damage or cold temperatures during flowering
and podding stages. Regression analysis overcame this limitation of the
model for chickpea crops grown at 95 locations in Australia using
70 years of historic data incorporating three cultivars and three sowing
times (early, mid, and late). We modified model parameters to include
the effect of soil water on thermal time calculations, which
significantly improved the prediction of flowering time. Simulated data,
and data from field experiments grown in Australia (2013 to 2019),
showed robust predictions for flowering time (n = 29; R2 = 0.97), and grain yield (n = 22; R2 = 0.63–0.70).
In addition, we identified threshold cold temperatures that
significantly affected predicted yield, and combinations of locations,
variety, and sowing time where the overlap between peak cold
temperatures and peak flowering was minimal. Our results showed that
frost and/or cold temperature–induced yield losses are a major
limitation in some unexpected Australian locations, e.g., inland,
subtropical latitudes in Queensland. Intermediate sowing maximise yield,
as it avoids cold temperature, late heat, and drought stresses
potentially limiting yield in early and late sowing respectively.
AB - During the
reproductive stage, chilling temperatures and frost reduce the yield of
chickpea and limit its adaptation. The adverse effects of chilling
temperature and frost in terms of the threshold temperatures, impact of
cold duration, and genotype-by-environment-by-management interactions
are not well quantified. Crop growth models that predict flowering time
and yield under diverse climates can identify combinations of cultivars
and sowing time to reduce frost risk in target environments. The
Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM-chickpea) model uses
daily temperatures to model basic crop growth but does not include
penalties for either frost damage or cold temperatures during flowering
and podding stages. Regression analysis overcame this limitation of the
model for chickpea crops grown at 95 locations in Australia using
70 years of historic data incorporating three cultivars and three sowing
times (early, mid, and late). We modified model parameters to include
the effect of soil water on thermal time calculations, which
significantly improved the prediction of flowering time. Simulated data,
and data from field experiments grown in Australia (2013 to 2019),
showed robust predictions for flowering time (n = 29; R2 = 0.97), and grain yield (n = 22; R2 = 0.63–0.70).
In addition, we identified threshold cold temperatures that
significantly affected predicted yield, and combinations of locations,
variety, and sowing time where the overlap between peak cold
temperatures and peak flowering was minimal. Our results showed that
frost and/or cold temperature–induced yield losses are a major
limitation in some unexpected Australian locations, e.g., inland,
subtropical latitudes in Queensland. Intermediate sowing maximise yield,
as it avoids cold temperature, late heat, and drought stresses
potentially limiting yield in early and late sowing respectively.
KW - APSIM
KW - Australia
KW - flowering time
KW - sowing date
KW - field trials
KW - Field trials
KW - Flowering time
KW - Sowing date
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116439403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116439403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00484-021-02197-8
DO - 10.1007/s00484-021-02197-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 34609561
SN - 0020-7128
VL - 66
SP - 111
EP - 125
JO - International Journal of Biometeorology
JF - International Journal of Biometeorology
IS - 1
ER -