New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation

David Nicholas, Eti Herman, Hamid Mahmuei, Bianca Rodriguez Bravo, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Tom Dobrowolski, Stephanie Pouchot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 20 Citations

Abstract

The article reports on a study of the views and actions of nearly a hundred scholars – mostly academic researchers from four European countries and four disciplines – in regard to scholarly reputation in the Science 2.0 age. It specifically looks at the role that ‘emerging’ reputational mechanisms and platforms are playing in building, maintaining, and showcasing scholarly reputation in the digital age. Popular examples of such platforms are ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Data were obtained through one-to-one interviews and focus groups, supported by desk research. The main findings were: (a) it is early days and uptake is light and patchy with platforms largely used for non-reputational purposes, such as sharing documents; (b) most users were passive and did not fully engage with the social aspects of the platforms; (c) the reputational focus was very much on just one scholarly activity (research), on just two outputs of that activity (publications and conferences) and one measurement of that activity (citations), but there are the stirrings of change; (d) young researchers are set to profit most from the emerging platforms.
LanguageEnglish
Pages169-183
Number of pages15
JournalLearned Publishing
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2015

Fingerprint

reputation
Social aspects
Profitability
profit
interview
Group

Cite this

Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Mahmuei, H., Bravo, B. R., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dobrowolski, T., & Pouchot, S. (2015). New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing, 28(3), 169-183. DOI: 10.1087/20150303
Nicholas, David ; Herman, Eti ; Mahmuei, Hamid ; Bravo, Bianca Rodriguez ; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa ; Dobrowolski, Tom ; Pouchot, Stephanie. / New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. In: Learned Publishing. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 169-183
@article{60745f7ea3444461b91b6fac4f40614e,
title = "New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation",
abstract = "The article reports on a study of the views and actions of nearly a hundred scholars – mostly academic researchers from four European countries and four disciplines – in regard to scholarly reputation in the Science 2.0 age. It specifically looks at the role that ‘emerging’ reputational mechanisms and platforms are playing in building, maintaining, and showcasing scholarly reputation in the digital age. Popular examples of such platforms are ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Data were obtained through one-to-one interviews and focus groups, supported by desk research. The main findings were: (a) it is early days and uptake is light and patchy with platforms largely used for non-reputational purposes, such as sharing documents; (b) most users were passive and did not fully engage with the social aspects of the platforms; (c) the reputational focus was very much on just one scholarly activity (research), on just two outputs of that activity (publications and conferences) and one measurement of that activity (citations), but there are the stirrings of change; (d) young researchers are set to profit most from the emerging platforms.",
keywords = "Open access version available",
author = "David Nicholas and Eti Herman and Hamid Mahmuei and Bravo, {Bianca Rodriguez} and Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri and Tom Dobrowolski and Stephanie Pouchot",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = July; Journal title (773t) = Learned Publishing. ISSNs: 0953-1513;",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1087/20150303",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "169--183",
journal = "Learned Publishing",
issn = "0953-1513",
publisher = "Association of Learned and Professional Society Publ.",
number = "3",

}

Nicholas, D, Herman, E, Mahmuei, H, Bravo, BR, Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C, Dobrowolski, T & Pouchot, S 2015, 'New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation' Learned Publishing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 169-183. DOI: 10.1087/20150303

New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. / Nicholas, David; Herman, Eti; Mahmuei, Hamid; Bravo, Bianca Rodriguez; Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Cherifa; Dobrowolski, Tom; Pouchot, Stephanie.

In: Learned Publishing, Vol. 28, No. 3, 07.2015, p. 169-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation

AU - Nicholas,David

AU - Herman,Eti

AU - Mahmuei,Hamid

AU - Bravo,Bianca Rodriguez

AU - Boukacem-Zeghmouri,Cherifa

AU - Dobrowolski,Tom

AU - Pouchot,Stephanie

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = July; Journal title (773t) = Learned Publishing. ISSNs: 0953-1513;

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - The article reports on a study of the views and actions of nearly a hundred scholars – mostly academic researchers from four European countries and four disciplines – in regard to scholarly reputation in the Science 2.0 age. It specifically looks at the role that ‘emerging’ reputational mechanisms and platforms are playing in building, maintaining, and showcasing scholarly reputation in the digital age. Popular examples of such platforms are ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Data were obtained through one-to-one interviews and focus groups, supported by desk research. The main findings were: (a) it is early days and uptake is light and patchy with platforms largely used for non-reputational purposes, such as sharing documents; (b) most users were passive and did not fully engage with the social aspects of the platforms; (c) the reputational focus was very much on just one scholarly activity (research), on just two outputs of that activity (publications and conferences) and one measurement of that activity (citations), but there are the stirrings of change; (d) young researchers are set to profit most from the emerging platforms.

AB - The article reports on a study of the views and actions of nearly a hundred scholars – mostly academic researchers from four European countries and four disciplines – in regard to scholarly reputation in the Science 2.0 age. It specifically looks at the role that ‘emerging’ reputational mechanisms and platforms are playing in building, maintaining, and showcasing scholarly reputation in the digital age. Popular examples of such platforms are ResearchGate and Academia.edu. Data were obtained through one-to-one interviews and focus groups, supported by desk research. The main findings were: (a) it is early days and uptake is light and patchy with platforms largely used for non-reputational purposes, such as sharing documents; (b) most users were passive and did not fully engage with the social aspects of the platforms; (c) the reputational focus was very much on just one scholarly activity (research), on just two outputs of that activity (publications and conferences) and one measurement of that activity (citations), but there are the stirrings of change; (d) young researchers are set to profit most from the emerging platforms.

KW - Open access version available

U2 - 10.1087/20150303

DO - 10.1087/20150303

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 169

EP - 183

JO - Learned Publishing

T2 - Learned Publishing

JF - Learned Publishing

SN - 0953-1513

IS - 3

ER -

Nicholas D, Herman E, Mahmuei H, Bravo BR, Boukacem-Zeghmouri C, Dobrowolski T et al. New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation. Learned Publishing. 2015 Jul;28(3):169-183. Available from, DOI: 10.1087/20150303