No time to de(con)struct

The Accessibility of Bush Fire Risk Management Plans in New South Wales, Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cultural heritage assets define our culture, providing a sense of place and emotional anchorage in space and time. As such they are regarded as assets worth protecting during disasters, including bushfires. Fire can damage cultural heritage assets through flames and radiant heat, and via inappropriate fire suppression activities during and immediately after a fire. Good planning can provide for the protection of cultural heritage assets during bushfires, but the information within the plans must be easily understood. This paper considers the accessibility of the information related to cultural heritage assists in all available NSW district bush fire management plans. Reading ease and reading age formulae were applied to each plan, and content analysis was used to explore the terminologies used, and the style in which the information was presented. The information regarding cultural assets in the plans was found to be difficult to read, replete with obscure terminology, and sometimes rambling and irrelevant; in short very inaccessible, especially in the high stress environment of a bushfire. The paper concludes with advice on improving the accessibility of these bush fire management plans, advice which will be equally applicable to other disaster plans which consider the protection of cultural heritage assets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-17
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Journal of Emergency Management
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

South Australia
New South Wales
Risk Management
Risk management
risk management
cultural heritage
assets
Fires
Disasters
Terminology
Reading
technical language
disaster
suppression
management
Hot Temperature
heat
time
content analysis
damages

Cite this

@article{720caae5f21043e6a3aa336266fd9e87,
title = "No time to de(con)struct: The Accessibility of Bush Fire Risk Management Plans in New South Wales, Australia",
abstract = "Cultural heritage assets define our culture, providing a sense of place and emotional anchorage in space and time. As such they are regarded as assets worth protecting during disasters, including bushfires. Fire can damage cultural heritage assets through flames and radiant heat, and via inappropriate fire suppression activities during and immediately after a fire. Good planning can provide for the protection of cultural heritage assets during bushfires, but the information within the plans must be easily understood. This paper considers the accessibility of the information related to cultural heritage assists in all available NSW district bush fire management plans. Reading ease and reading age formulae were applied to each plan, and content analysis was used to explore the terminologies used, and the style in which the information was presented. The information regarding cultural assets in the plans was found to be difficult to read, replete with obscure terminology, and sometimes rambling and irrelevant; in short very inaccessible, especially in the high stress environment of a bushfire. The paper concludes with advice on improving the accessibility of these bush fire management plans, advice which will be equally applicable to other disaster plans which consider the protection of cultural heritage assets.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Cultural heritage management, Emergency management, Language, Planning, Policy",
author = "Prue Laidlaw and Spennemann, {Dirk HR} and Catherine Allan",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. ISSNs: 1324-1540;",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "5--17",
journal = "Australian Journal of Emergency Management",
issn = "1324-1540",
publisher = "Emergency Management Australia",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No time to de(con)struct

T2 - The Accessibility of Bush Fire Risk Management Plans in New South Wales, Australia

AU - Laidlaw, Prue

AU - Spennemann, Dirk HR

AU - Allan, Catherine

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = The Australian Journal of Emergency Management. ISSNs: 1324-1540;

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Cultural heritage assets define our culture, providing a sense of place and emotional anchorage in space and time. As such they are regarded as assets worth protecting during disasters, including bushfires. Fire can damage cultural heritage assets through flames and radiant heat, and via inappropriate fire suppression activities during and immediately after a fire. Good planning can provide for the protection of cultural heritage assets during bushfires, but the information within the plans must be easily understood. This paper considers the accessibility of the information related to cultural heritage assists in all available NSW district bush fire management plans. Reading ease and reading age formulae were applied to each plan, and content analysis was used to explore the terminologies used, and the style in which the information was presented. The information regarding cultural assets in the plans was found to be difficult to read, replete with obscure terminology, and sometimes rambling and irrelevant; in short very inaccessible, especially in the high stress environment of a bushfire. The paper concludes with advice on improving the accessibility of these bush fire management plans, advice which will be equally applicable to other disaster plans which consider the protection of cultural heritage assets.

AB - Cultural heritage assets define our culture, providing a sense of place and emotional anchorage in space and time. As such they are regarded as assets worth protecting during disasters, including bushfires. Fire can damage cultural heritage assets through flames and radiant heat, and via inappropriate fire suppression activities during and immediately after a fire. Good planning can provide for the protection of cultural heritage assets during bushfires, but the information within the plans must be easily understood. This paper considers the accessibility of the information related to cultural heritage assists in all available NSW district bush fire management plans. Reading ease and reading age formulae were applied to each plan, and content analysis was used to explore the terminologies used, and the style in which the information was presented. The information regarding cultural assets in the plans was found to be difficult to read, replete with obscure terminology, and sometimes rambling and irrelevant; in short very inaccessible, especially in the high stress environment of a bushfire. The paper concludes with advice on improving the accessibility of these bush fire management plans, advice which will be equally applicable to other disaster plans which consider the protection of cultural heritage assets.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Cultural heritage management

KW - Emergency management

KW - Language

KW - Planning

KW - Policy

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 5

EP - 17

JO - Australian Journal of Emergency Management

JF - Australian Journal of Emergency Management

SN - 1324-1540

IS - 1

ER -