Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 197-210 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Implicit Religion |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
On why Gaita doesnt describe Eichmann as sacred. / Segal, Alexander; Luck, Morgan.
In: Implicit Religion, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2014, p. 197-210.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - On why Gaita doesnt describe Eichmann as sacred
AU - Segal, Alexander
AU - Luck, Morgan
N1 - Includes bibliographical references.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In this article we examine a potential problem for Raimond Gaita (born 1946). It arises from the way that Gaita, in Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception, affirms the value of describing Eichmann as sacred, yet says that he, as a non-religious person, is unable to describe Eichmann as sacred. We argue that the tension in Gaita's position does not in reality amount to a contradiction, and so we defuse the potential problem.
AB - In this article we examine a potential problem for Raimond Gaita (born 1946). It arises from the way that Gaita, in Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception, affirms the value of describing Eichmann as sacred, yet says that he, as a non-religious person, is unable to describe Eichmann as sacred. We argue that the tension in Gaita's position does not in reality amount to a contradiction, and so we defuse the potential problem.
KW - Gaita
KW - Eichmann
KW - Sacred
KW - Religious
U2 - 10.1558/imre.v17i2.197
DO - 10.1558/imre.v17i2.197
M3 - Article
VL - 17
SP - 197
EP - 210
JO - Implicit Religion
JF - Implicit Religion
SN - 1463-9955
IS - 2
ER -