One More Time without Feeling

Detecting Fabricated Remorse Using Linguistic Analysis

Benjamin Moberley, Gina Villar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the benefits to be gained from successfully feigning the emotion of remorse, few studies have addressed the identification of fabricated statements of remorse. We investigated whether there were differences in first person singular pronoun use between genuine versus deceptive displays of remorse in typewritten statements of remorse. Results showed that participants produced a significantly higher proportion of first person singular pronouns (I, me, and my) in their genuine versus deceptive statements. These findings suggest there are measurable differences in language use between genuine and falsified expressions of remorse and highlight the potential utility of language analysis in the identification of true versus fabricated statements of remorse.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-112
Number of pages11
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online dateJun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Emotions
Language
linguistics
language analysis
human being
emotion
language

Cite this

@article{183de20319114a7c976a78d85406aa34,
title = "One More Time without Feeling: Detecting Fabricated Remorse Using Linguistic Analysis",
abstract = "Despite the benefits to be gained from successfully feigning the emotion of remorse, few studies have addressed the identification of fabricated statements of remorse. We investigated whether there were differences in first person singular pronoun use between genuine versus deceptive displays of remorse in typewritten statements of remorse. Results showed that participants produced a significantly higher proportion of first person singular pronouns (I, me, and my) in their genuine versus deceptive statements. These findings suggest there are measurable differences in language use between genuine and falsified expressions of remorse and highlight the potential utility of language analysis in the identification of true versus fabricated statements of remorse.",
keywords = "deception, first person pronouns, linguistic analysis, remorse, self-references",
author = "Benjamin Moberley and Gina Villar",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/13218719.2015.1032955",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "102--112",
journal = "Psychiatry, Psychology and Law",
issn = "1321-8719",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

One More Time without Feeling : Detecting Fabricated Remorse Using Linguistic Analysis. / Moberley, Benjamin; Villar, Gina.

In: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Vol. 23, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 102-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - One More Time without Feeling

T2 - Detecting Fabricated Remorse Using Linguistic Analysis

AU - Moberley, Benjamin

AU - Villar, Gina

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Despite the benefits to be gained from successfully feigning the emotion of remorse, few studies have addressed the identification of fabricated statements of remorse. We investigated whether there were differences in first person singular pronoun use between genuine versus deceptive displays of remorse in typewritten statements of remorse. Results showed that participants produced a significantly higher proportion of first person singular pronouns (I, me, and my) in their genuine versus deceptive statements. These findings suggest there are measurable differences in language use between genuine and falsified expressions of remorse and highlight the potential utility of language analysis in the identification of true versus fabricated statements of remorse.

AB - Despite the benefits to be gained from successfully feigning the emotion of remorse, few studies have addressed the identification of fabricated statements of remorse. We investigated whether there were differences in first person singular pronoun use between genuine versus deceptive displays of remorse in typewritten statements of remorse. Results showed that participants produced a significantly higher proportion of first person singular pronouns (I, me, and my) in their genuine versus deceptive statements. These findings suggest there are measurable differences in language use between genuine and falsified expressions of remorse and highlight the potential utility of language analysis in the identification of true versus fabricated statements of remorse.

KW - deception

KW - first person pronouns

KW - linguistic analysis

KW - remorse

KW - self-references

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959199408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959199408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2015.1032955

DO - 10.1080/13218719.2015.1032955

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 102

EP - 112

JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

SN - 1321-8719

IS - 1

ER -