Ontogeny of critical and prolonged swimming performance for the larvae of six Australian freshwater fish species

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critical (<30min) and prolonged (>60min) swimming speeds in laboratory chambers were determined for larvae of six species of Australian freshwater fishes: trout cod Maccullochella macquariensis, Murray cod Maccullochella peelii, golden perch Macquaria ambigua, silver perch Bidyanus bidyanus, carp gudgeon Hypseleotris spp. and Murray River rainbowfish Melanotaenia fluviatilis. Developmental stage (preflexion, flexion, postflexion and metalarva) better explained swimming ability than did length, size or age (days after hatch). Critical speed increased with larval development, and metalarvae were the fastest swimmers for all species. Maccullochella macquariensis larvae had the highest critical [maximum absolute 46·4cms-1 and 44·6 relative body lengths (LB) s-1] and prolonged (maximum 15·4cms-1, 15·6 LB s-1) swimming speeds and B. bidyanus larvae the lowest critical (minimum 0·1cms-1, 0·3 LB s-1) and prolonged swimming speeds (minimum 1·1cms-1, 1·0 LB s-1). Prolonged swimming trials determined that the larvae of some species could not swim for 60min at any speed, whereas the larvae of the best swimming species, M. macquariensis, could swim for 60min at 44% of the critical speed. The swimming performance of species with precocial life-history strategies, with well-developed larvae at hatch, was comparatively better and potentially had greater ability to influence their dispersal by actively swimming than species with altricial life-history strategies, with poorly developed larvae at hatch.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1820-1841
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Fish Biology
Volume84
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ontogeny of critical and prolonged swimming performance for the larvae of six Australian freshwater fish species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this