Opportunistic terrorism

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper critically addresses two central aspects of Frances Kamm's account of conceptual and evaluative issues of terrorism in 'Terrorism and Intending Evil', Ethics for Enemies (oup 2011), chapter 2. The paper engages with what Kamm says about cases in which an act done from a morally bad intention or motive overtly exactly mimics a justifiable act. I argue that in such a case, an actor's intention to terrorise is more significant to the question of whether what he or she does is a terrorist act than Kamm allows. I also press considerations that run counter to Kamm's view that in such cases an actor's intention or motive is not directly relevant to the moral permissibility of actions that harm other people who are not otherwise liable to receive that type and degree of harm.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)395-410
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Moral Philosophy
    Volume11
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Kamm
    Terrorism
    Intentions
    Harm
    Terrorist
    Enemy
    Evil
    Permissibility

    Cite this

    Uniacke, Suzanne. / Opportunistic terrorism. In: Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 395-410.
    @article{f0b5566ba67447958e34480e9464cfc0,
    title = "Opportunistic terrorism",
    abstract = "This paper critically addresses two central aspects of Frances Kamm's account of conceptual and evaluative issues of terrorism in 'Terrorism and Intending Evil', Ethics for Enemies (oup 2011), chapter 2. The paper engages with what Kamm says about cases in which an act done from a morally bad intention or motive overtly exactly mimics a justifiable act. I argue that in such a case, an actor's intention to terrorise is more significant to the question of whether what he or she does is a terrorist act than Kamm allows. I also press considerations that run counter to Kamm's view that in such cases an actor's intention or motive is not directly relevant to the moral permissibility of actions that harm other people who are not otherwise liable to receive that type and degree of harm.",
    keywords = "Intention, Motive, Permissibility, Terrorist act, Wrongdoing",
    author = "Suzanne Uniacke",
    note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1163/17455243-01104003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "395--410",
    journal = "Journal of Moral Philosophy",
    issn = "1740-4681",
    publisher = "Brill",
    number = "4",

    }

    Opportunistic terrorism. / Uniacke, Suzanne.

    In: Journal of Moral Philosophy, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2014, p. 395-410.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Opportunistic terrorism

    AU - Uniacke, Suzanne

    N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This paper critically addresses two central aspects of Frances Kamm's account of conceptual and evaluative issues of terrorism in 'Terrorism and Intending Evil', Ethics for Enemies (oup 2011), chapter 2. The paper engages with what Kamm says about cases in which an act done from a morally bad intention or motive overtly exactly mimics a justifiable act. I argue that in such a case, an actor's intention to terrorise is more significant to the question of whether what he or she does is a terrorist act than Kamm allows. I also press considerations that run counter to Kamm's view that in such cases an actor's intention or motive is not directly relevant to the moral permissibility of actions that harm other people who are not otherwise liable to receive that type and degree of harm.

    AB - This paper critically addresses two central aspects of Frances Kamm's account of conceptual and evaluative issues of terrorism in 'Terrorism and Intending Evil', Ethics for Enemies (oup 2011), chapter 2. The paper engages with what Kamm says about cases in which an act done from a morally bad intention or motive overtly exactly mimics a justifiable act. I argue that in such a case, an actor's intention to terrorise is more significant to the question of whether what he or she does is a terrorist act than Kamm allows. I also press considerations that run counter to Kamm's view that in such cases an actor's intention or motive is not directly relevant to the moral permissibility of actions that harm other people who are not otherwise liable to receive that type and degree of harm.

    KW - Intention

    KW - Motive

    KW - Permissibility

    KW - Terrorist act

    KW - Wrongdoing

    U2 - 10.1163/17455243-01104003

    DO - 10.1163/17455243-01104003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 395

    EP - 410

    JO - Journal of Moral Philosophy

    JF - Journal of Moral Philosophy

    SN - 1740-4681

    IS - 4

    ER -