TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing outcomes for children with phonological impairment
T2 - A systematic search and review of outcome and experience measures reported in intervention research
AU - Baker, Elise
AU - Masso, Sarah
AU - Huyn, Kylie
AU - Sugdena, Ellie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors.
PY - 2022/7/6
Y1 - 2022/7/6
N2 - PURPOSE: Reporting of outcome and experience measures is critical to our understanding of the effect of intervention for speech sound disorders (SSD) in children. There is currently no agreed-upon set of measures for reporting intervention outcomes and experiences. In this article, we introduce the Speech Outcome Reporting Taxonomy (SORT), a tool designed to assist with the classification of outcome and experience measures. In a systematic search and review using the SORT, we explore the type and frequency of these measures reported in intervention research addressing phonological impairment in children. Given the integral relationship between intervention fidelity and intervention outcomes, reporting of fidelity is also examined.METHOD: Five literature databases were searched to identify articles written or translated into English published between 1975 and 2020. Using the SORT, outcome and experience measures were extracted and categorized. The number of intervention studies reporting fidelity was determined.RESULTS: A total of 220 articles met inclusion criteria. The most frequently reported outcome domain was broad generalization measures (
n = 142, 64.5%), followed by specific measures of generalization of an intervention target (
n = 133, 60.5%). Eleven (5.0%) articles reported measures of the impact of the phonological impairment on children's activity, participation, quality of life, or others. Twenty articles (9.1%) reported on parent, child, or clinician experience or child engagement. Fidelity data were reported for 13.4% of studies of interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of intervention outcomes is challenging yet important. No single type of measure was reported across all articles. Through using tailored measures closely related to intervention targets in combination with a universal set of measures of intelligibility, the impact of phonological impairment on children's lives, and the experience of receiving and providing intervention, researchers and clinicians could work together to progress insights and innovations in science and practice for children with SSD.SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19497803.
AB - PURPOSE: Reporting of outcome and experience measures is critical to our understanding of the effect of intervention for speech sound disorders (SSD) in children. There is currently no agreed-upon set of measures for reporting intervention outcomes and experiences. In this article, we introduce the Speech Outcome Reporting Taxonomy (SORT), a tool designed to assist with the classification of outcome and experience measures. In a systematic search and review using the SORT, we explore the type and frequency of these measures reported in intervention research addressing phonological impairment in children. Given the integral relationship between intervention fidelity and intervention outcomes, reporting of fidelity is also examined.METHOD: Five literature databases were searched to identify articles written or translated into English published between 1975 and 2020. Using the SORT, outcome and experience measures were extracted and categorized. The number of intervention studies reporting fidelity was determined.RESULTS: A total of 220 articles met inclusion criteria. The most frequently reported outcome domain was broad generalization measures (
n = 142, 64.5%), followed by specific measures of generalization of an intervention target (
n = 133, 60.5%). Eleven (5.0%) articles reported measures of the impact of the phonological impairment on children's activity, participation, quality of life, or others. Twenty articles (9.1%) reported on parent, child, or clinician experience or child engagement. Fidelity data were reported for 13.4% of studies of interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of intervention outcomes is challenging yet important. No single type of measure was reported across all articles. Through using tailored measures closely related to intervention targets in combination with a universal set of measures of intelligibility, the impact of phonological impairment on children's lives, and the experience of receiving and providing intervention, researchers and clinicians could work together to progress insights and innovations in science and practice for children with SSD.SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.19497803.
KW - Articulation Disorders
KW - Child
KW - Humans
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Speech
KW - Speech Sound Disorder/therapy
KW - Speech Therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133906084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133906084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00132
DO - 10.1044/2022_LSHSS-21-00132
M3 - Article
C2 - 35394819
AN - SCOPUS:85133906084
SN - 1558-9129
VL - 53
SP - 732
EP - 748
JO - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
JF - Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
IS - 3
ER -