Ottawa Ankle Rules are more sensitive than Dutch in detecting significant ankle feature: Commentary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English
Number of pages	1
Journal	Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
Volume	48
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60178-1
Publication status	Published - 01 Jan 2002

Access to Document

@article{4e9c39fca6994fd18bf5d0785047c308,

title = "Ottawa Ankle Rules are more sensitive than Dutch in detecting significant ankle feature: Commentary",

author = "Rod Pope",

year = "2002",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60178-1",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

journal = "Australian Journal of Physiotherapy",

issn = "0004-9514",

publisher = "Australian Physiotherapy Association",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ottawa Ankle Rules are more sensitive than Dutch in detecting significant ankle feature

T2 - Commentary

AU - Pope, Rod

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036913025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036913025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60178-1

DO - 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60178-1

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 12542039

AN - SCOPUS:0036913025

SN - 0004-9514

VL - 48

JO - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

JF - Australian Journal of Physiotherapy

IS - 4

ER -