Over or under? Autonomous sensor fish reveals why overshot weirs may be safer than undershot weirs for fish passage

Brett D. Pflugrath, Craig A. Boys, Bruce Cathers, Zhiqun Daniel Deng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Many riverine fish species disperse downstream as eggs, juveniles, or adults, which can expose them to injury and death at hydraulic structures. Low-head weirs are one example of a structure that can kill fish, and this impact has been shown to be substantially higher for undershot weirs when compared to overshot weirs. In this study, autonomous sensor devices were released at an overshot and undershot weir under similar discharges to assess what stressors maybe contributing to differences in the survival rates of fish. Although the undershot weir was more likely to expose fish to rapid decompression, the intensity of decompression was mild and it is more likely that higher levels of fluid shear at the undershot are more damaging to early life stage and small-bodied fish. Both weirs showed potential for strike, but this could be managed through improvements in design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-48
Number of pages8
JournalEcological Engineering
Volume132
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Weirs
Fish
sensor
weir
Sensors
fish
decompression
hydraulic structure
Hydraulic structures
egg
fluid
Fluids

Cite this

@article{64fdd19613cb46269c7bd69e8f6f0185,
title = "Over or under? Autonomous sensor fish reveals why overshot weirs may be safer than undershot weirs for fish passage",
abstract = "Many riverine fish species disperse downstream as eggs, juveniles, or adults, which can expose them to injury and death at hydraulic structures. Low-head weirs are one example of a structure that can kill fish, and this impact has been shown to be substantially higher for undershot weirs when compared to overshot weirs. In this study, autonomous sensor devices were released at an overshot and undershot weir under similar discharges to assess what stressors maybe contributing to differences in the survival rates of fish. Although the undershot weir was more likely to expose fish to rapid decompression, the intensity of decompression was mild and it is more likely that higher levels of fluid shear at the undershot are more damaging to early life stage and small-bodied fish. Both weirs showed potential for strike, but this could be managed through improvements in design.",
keywords = "Decompression, Fish passage, Overshot, Shear, Sluice gate, Strike, Undershot, Weir",
author = "Pflugrath, {Brett D.} and Boys, {Craig A.} and Bruce Cathers and Deng, {Zhiqun Daniel}",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "41--48",
journal = "Ecological Engineering",
issn = "0925-8574",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Over or under? Autonomous sensor fish reveals why overshot weirs may be safer than undershot weirs for fish passage. / Pflugrath, Brett D.; Boys, Craig A.; Cathers, Bruce; Deng, Zhiqun Daniel.

In: Ecological Engineering, Vol. 132, 01.07.2019, p. 41-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Over or under? Autonomous sensor fish reveals why overshot weirs may be safer than undershot weirs for fish passage

AU - Pflugrath, Brett D.

AU - Boys, Craig A.

AU - Cathers, Bruce

AU - Deng, Zhiqun Daniel

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Many riverine fish species disperse downstream as eggs, juveniles, or adults, which can expose them to injury and death at hydraulic structures. Low-head weirs are one example of a structure that can kill fish, and this impact has been shown to be substantially higher for undershot weirs when compared to overshot weirs. In this study, autonomous sensor devices were released at an overshot and undershot weir under similar discharges to assess what stressors maybe contributing to differences in the survival rates of fish. Although the undershot weir was more likely to expose fish to rapid decompression, the intensity of decompression was mild and it is more likely that higher levels of fluid shear at the undershot are more damaging to early life stage and small-bodied fish. Both weirs showed potential for strike, but this could be managed through improvements in design.

AB - Many riverine fish species disperse downstream as eggs, juveniles, or adults, which can expose them to injury and death at hydraulic structures. Low-head weirs are one example of a structure that can kill fish, and this impact has been shown to be substantially higher for undershot weirs when compared to overshot weirs. In this study, autonomous sensor devices were released at an overshot and undershot weir under similar discharges to assess what stressors maybe contributing to differences in the survival rates of fish. Although the undershot weir was more likely to expose fish to rapid decompression, the intensity of decompression was mild and it is more likely that higher levels of fluid shear at the undershot are more damaging to early life stage and small-bodied fish. Both weirs showed potential for strike, but this could be managed through improvements in design.

KW - Decompression

KW - Fish passage

KW - Overshot

KW - Shear

KW - Sluice gate

KW - Strike

KW - Undershot

KW - Weir

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063758445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063758445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.03.010

M3 - Article

VL - 132

SP - 41

EP - 48

JO - Ecological Engineering

JF - Ecological Engineering

SN - 0925-8574

ER -