Paternalism, consent and the use of experimental drugs in the military

Jessica Wolfendale, Stephen Clarke

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Modern military organizations are paternalistic organizations.They typically recognize a duty of care toward military personnel and are willing to ignore or violate the consent of military personnel in order to uphold that duty of care. In this paper, we consider the case for paternalism in the military and distinguish it from the case for paternalism in medicine. We argue that one can consistently reject paternalism in medicine but uphold paternalism in the military. We consider two well-known arguments for the conclusiont hat military organizations should not be entitled to use experimental drugs on troops without first obtaining the informed consent of those troops. We argue that both of these are unsuccessful,in the absence of an argument for the rejection of paternalism in the military altogether. The case for military paternalism is widely accepted. However, we consider three ways in which it could be challenged.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)337-355
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy
    Volume33
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Paternalism, consent and the use of experimental drugs in the military'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this