Perceived agricultural runoff impact on drinking water

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Agricultural runoff into surface water is a problem in Australia, as it is in arguably all agriculturally active countries. While farm practices and resource management measures areemployed to reduce downstream effects, they are often either technically insufficient or practically unsustainable. Therefore, consumers may still be exposed to agrichemicalswhenever they turn on the tap. For rural residents surrounded by agriculture, the link between agriculture and water quality is easy to make and thus informed decisions aboutwater consumption are possible. Urban residents, however, are removed from agricultural activity and indeed drinking water sources. Urban and rural residents were interviewed to identify perceptions of agriculture's impact on drinking water. Rural residents thought agriculture could impact their water quality and, in many cases, actively avoided it, oftenpreferring tank to surface water sources. Urban residents generally did not perceive agriculture to pose health risks to their drinking water. Although there are more agriculturalcontaminants recognised in the latest Australian Drinking Water Guidelines than previously, we argue this is insufficient to enhance consumer protection. Health authorities may better serve the public by improving their proactivity and providing communities and water utilities with the capacity to effectively monitor and address agricultural runoff.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)484-491
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Water and Health
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2014

Fingerprint

agricultural runoff
Agriculture
Drinking Water
drinking water
agriculture
Water Quality
Water
surface water
water quality
Practice Management
Health
health risk
resource management
farm
Guidelines

Cite this

@article{957723266ac84a22adff96c19b5de018,
title = "Perceived agricultural runoff impact on drinking water",
abstract = "Agricultural runoff into surface water is a problem in Australia, as it is in arguably all agriculturally active countries. While farm practices and resource management measures areemployed to reduce downstream effects, they are often either technically insufficient or practically unsustainable. Therefore, consumers may still be exposed to agrichemicalswhenever they turn on the tap. For rural residents surrounded by agriculture, the link between agriculture and water quality is easy to make and thus informed decisions aboutwater consumption are possible. Urban residents, however, are removed from agricultural activity and indeed drinking water sources. Urban and rural residents were interviewed to identify perceptions of agriculture's impact on drinking water. Rural residents thought agriculture could impact their water quality and, in many cases, actively avoided it, oftenpreferring tank to surface water sources. Urban residents generally did not perceive agriculture to pose health risks to their drinking water. Although there are more agriculturalcontaminants recognised in the latest Australian Drinking Water Guidelines than previously, we argue this is insufficient to enhance consumer protection. Health authorities may better serve the public by improving their proactivity and providing communities and water utilities with the capacity to effectively monitor and address agricultural runoff.",
keywords = "Chemicals, Water policy, Drinking water, Pollution, Rural, Tank water",
author = "Andrea Crampton and Angela Ragusa",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
doi = "10.2166/wh.2014.212",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "484--491",
journal = "Journal of Water and Health",
issn = "1477-8920",
publisher = "Iwa Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Perceived agricultural runoff impact on drinking water. / Crampton, Andrea; Ragusa, Angela.

In: Journal of Water and Health, Vol. 12, No. 3, 09.2014, p. 484-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived agricultural runoff impact on drinking water

AU - Crampton, Andrea

AU - Ragusa, Angela

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Agricultural runoff into surface water is a problem in Australia, as it is in arguably all agriculturally active countries. While farm practices and resource management measures areemployed to reduce downstream effects, they are often either technically insufficient or practically unsustainable. Therefore, consumers may still be exposed to agrichemicalswhenever they turn on the tap. For rural residents surrounded by agriculture, the link between agriculture and water quality is easy to make and thus informed decisions aboutwater consumption are possible. Urban residents, however, are removed from agricultural activity and indeed drinking water sources. Urban and rural residents were interviewed to identify perceptions of agriculture's impact on drinking water. Rural residents thought agriculture could impact their water quality and, in many cases, actively avoided it, oftenpreferring tank to surface water sources. Urban residents generally did not perceive agriculture to pose health risks to their drinking water. Although there are more agriculturalcontaminants recognised in the latest Australian Drinking Water Guidelines than previously, we argue this is insufficient to enhance consumer protection. Health authorities may better serve the public by improving their proactivity and providing communities and water utilities with the capacity to effectively monitor and address agricultural runoff.

AB - Agricultural runoff into surface water is a problem in Australia, as it is in arguably all agriculturally active countries. While farm practices and resource management measures areemployed to reduce downstream effects, they are often either technically insufficient or practically unsustainable. Therefore, consumers may still be exposed to agrichemicalswhenever they turn on the tap. For rural residents surrounded by agriculture, the link between agriculture and water quality is easy to make and thus informed decisions aboutwater consumption are possible. Urban residents, however, are removed from agricultural activity and indeed drinking water sources. Urban and rural residents were interviewed to identify perceptions of agriculture's impact on drinking water. Rural residents thought agriculture could impact their water quality and, in many cases, actively avoided it, oftenpreferring tank to surface water sources. Urban residents generally did not perceive agriculture to pose health risks to their drinking water. Although there are more agriculturalcontaminants recognised in the latest Australian Drinking Water Guidelines than previously, we argue this is insufficient to enhance consumer protection. Health authorities may better serve the public by improving their proactivity and providing communities and water utilities with the capacity to effectively monitor and address agricultural runoff.

KW - Chemicals

KW - Water policy

KW - Drinking water

KW - Pollution

KW - Rural

KW - Tank water

U2 - 10.2166/wh.2014.212

DO - 10.2166/wh.2014.212

M3 - Article

C2 - 25252352

VL - 12

SP - 484

EP - 491

JO - Journal of Water and Health

JF - Journal of Water and Health

SN - 1477-8920

IS - 3

ER -