Perceptions of incompetence in the ICT workplace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine incompetence in the Australian ICT workplace from the perspective of Australian ICT professionals. The data collection for this project included conducting a quantitative survey, conducting qualitative interviews and conducting focus group discussions with key informants. Of the 2,315 respondents who participated in the survey, the MRF analysis revealed that incompetence was ranked fifth from the top of a list of the 57 most common ethical problems experienced by ICT professionals (N=750, 35.9%). An inspection of the results of the cross tabulations revealed that 34.8% described their occupational category as manager and 29.1% indicated they were consultants. The GLM has found a significant relationship between the choice of incompetence and occupation (Deviance = 23.15, Df = 6, P=0.0007) suggesting occupation, among other things, does predict the choice of incompetence. The findings from the qualitative interviews are consistent with the above findings. A cross referencing of the interviewees responses that addressed the issue of incompetence during the interviews against their occupation has revealed that consultants had more to say on the topic than any other occupation (20.8% or 10 of the 48 references). This is followed by managers who accounted for 14.6% (7 of the 48 references). These findings indicate that the experienced professionals have a greater concern about incompetence than others; an observation that the findings from the focus group interviews have also confirmed. Obtaining such findings would not have been possible had only one method been used.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-17
Number of pages7
JournalComputers and Society
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2015

Fingerprint

occupation
workplace
qualitative interview
manager
deviant behavior
interview
group discussion
Group

Grant Number

  • LP130100808

Cite this

@article{a6daed6a107444cc8187b1abdeff83f4,
title = "Perceptions of incompetence in the ICT workplace",
abstract = "The aim of this study is to examine incompetence in the Australian ICT workplace from the perspective of Australian ICT professionals. The data collection for this project included conducting a quantitative survey, conducting qualitative interviews and conducting focus group discussions with key informants. Of the 2,315 respondents who participated in the survey, the MRF analysis revealed that incompetence was ranked fifth from the top of a list of the 57 most common ethical problems experienced by ICT professionals (N=750, 35.9{\%}). An inspection of the results of the cross tabulations revealed that 34.8{\%} described their occupational category as manager and 29.1{\%} indicated they were consultants. The GLM has found a significant relationship between the choice of incompetence and occupation (Deviance = 23.15, Df = 6, P=0.0007) suggesting occupation, among other things, does predict the choice of incompetence. The findings from the qualitative interviews are consistent with the above findings. A cross referencing of the interviewees responses that addressed the issue of incompetence during the interviews against their occupation has revealed that consultants had more to say on the topic than any other occupation (20.8{\%} or 10 of the 48 references). This is followed by managers who accounted for 14.6{\%} (7 of the 48 references). These findings indicate that the experienced professionals have a greater concern about incompetence than others; an observation that the findings from the focus group interviews have also confirmed. Obtaining such findings would not have been possible had only one method been used.",
author = "Yeslam Al-Saggaf and Oliver Burmeister and John Weckert",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = September; Journal title (773t) = Computers and Society. ISSNs: 0095-2737;",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1145/2874239.2874241",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "11--17",
journal = "Computers and Society",
issn = "0095-2737",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
number = "3",

}

Perceptions of incompetence in the ICT workplace. / Al-Saggaf, Yeslam; Burmeister, Oliver; Weckert, John.

In: Computers and Society, Vol. 45, No. 3, 09.2015, p. 11-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of incompetence in the ICT workplace

AU - Al-Saggaf, Yeslam

AU - Burmeister, Oliver

AU - Weckert, John

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = September; Journal title (773t) = Computers and Society. ISSNs: 0095-2737;

PY - 2015/9

Y1 - 2015/9

N2 - The aim of this study is to examine incompetence in the Australian ICT workplace from the perspective of Australian ICT professionals. The data collection for this project included conducting a quantitative survey, conducting qualitative interviews and conducting focus group discussions with key informants. Of the 2,315 respondents who participated in the survey, the MRF analysis revealed that incompetence was ranked fifth from the top of a list of the 57 most common ethical problems experienced by ICT professionals (N=750, 35.9%). An inspection of the results of the cross tabulations revealed that 34.8% described their occupational category as manager and 29.1% indicated they were consultants. The GLM has found a significant relationship between the choice of incompetence and occupation (Deviance = 23.15, Df = 6, P=0.0007) suggesting occupation, among other things, does predict the choice of incompetence. The findings from the qualitative interviews are consistent with the above findings. A cross referencing of the interviewees responses that addressed the issue of incompetence during the interviews against their occupation has revealed that consultants had more to say on the topic than any other occupation (20.8% or 10 of the 48 references). This is followed by managers who accounted for 14.6% (7 of the 48 references). These findings indicate that the experienced professionals have a greater concern about incompetence than others; an observation that the findings from the focus group interviews have also confirmed. Obtaining such findings would not have been possible had only one method been used.

AB - The aim of this study is to examine incompetence in the Australian ICT workplace from the perspective of Australian ICT professionals. The data collection for this project included conducting a quantitative survey, conducting qualitative interviews and conducting focus group discussions with key informants. Of the 2,315 respondents who participated in the survey, the MRF analysis revealed that incompetence was ranked fifth from the top of a list of the 57 most common ethical problems experienced by ICT professionals (N=750, 35.9%). An inspection of the results of the cross tabulations revealed that 34.8% described their occupational category as manager and 29.1% indicated they were consultants. The GLM has found a significant relationship between the choice of incompetence and occupation (Deviance = 23.15, Df = 6, P=0.0007) suggesting occupation, among other things, does predict the choice of incompetence. The findings from the qualitative interviews are consistent with the above findings. A cross referencing of the interviewees responses that addressed the issue of incompetence during the interviews against their occupation has revealed that consultants had more to say on the topic than any other occupation (20.8% or 10 of the 48 references). This is followed by managers who accounted for 14.6% (7 of the 48 references). These findings indicate that the experienced professionals have a greater concern about incompetence than others; an observation that the findings from the focus group interviews have also confirmed. Obtaining such findings would not have been possible had only one method been used.

U2 - 10.1145/2874239.2874241

DO - 10.1145/2874239.2874241

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 11

EP - 17

JO - Computers and Society

JF - Computers and Society

SN - 0095-2737

IS - 3

ER -