Police interviews with terrorist suspects: Risks, ethical interviewing and procedural justice

Karl Roberts

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose ' Police interviews with terrorist suspects are perhaps one of the most challenging interviews a police officer will experience. The purpose of this paper is to explore the social context of these interviews and the impact that this might have upon the way in which police officers carry them out, including the use of robust, even aggressive tactics. Design/methodology/approach ' Risks associated with police interview tactics are identified, including obtaining unreliable information, problems with suspect cooperation and the potential impact upon communities including problems with the perceived legitimacy of the police and community cooperation. Findings ' Ways of mitigating the risks are considered including improving police officer cultural awareness, a consideration of interview tactics and the use of ethical interview approaches such as the planning and preparation, engage and explain, account, closure, evaluation interview model and conversation management. Originality/value ' The impact of the use of ethical interviewing is considered from a procedural justice perspective, and the paper illustrates how this approach may give rise to improved reliability of information from interviews and may impact upon perceptions of police legitimacy from communities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)124-134
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Forensic Practice
    Volume13
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - May 2011

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Police interviews with terrorist suspects: Risks, ethical interviewing and procedural justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this