TY - JOUR
T1 - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in soils and sediments
T2 - Sustainable approaches for extraction and remediation
AU - Kariyawasam, Thiloka
AU - Doran, Gregory S.
AU - Howitt, Julia A.
AU - Prenzler, Paul D.
N1 - Funding Information:
MAE is frequently applied in the extraction of the pollutants such as PAHs, PCBs and pesticides from environmental samples (Ib??ez and Cifuentes, 2017; Lv et al., 2010; Miyawaki et al., 2018; Shu et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2016). Lau et al. (2010) noted that MAE allows efficient and reproducible extraction of PAHs from soil samples. Moreover, Wang, Meng, Lu, Liu, and Tao (2007a) reported that MAE shows higher analytical recoveries compared to Soxhlet extraction, whereas it was lower compared to accelerated solvent extraction when analysed using HPLC-FLD/UV. Chee, Wong, and Lee (1996); Dean et al. (1995); S?nchez-Ur?a and Castillo-Busto (2018); Shu et al. (2000) support the above observation reporting higher extraction efficiencies in pMAE compared to Soxhlet extraction. According to Wang et al. (2016), pMAE provides higher recoveries than pressurized liquid extraction for complex matrices and is known to show higher recoveries of PAHs than SFE, although pMAE was similar to Soxhlet extraction (Saim et al., 1997). However, only a few researchers (Bangkedphol et al., 2006; Chee et al., 1996; Pino et al., 2000) have focused on the optimization of the pMAE conditions for PAH contaminated soil/sediments, applying experimental design approaches such as orthogonal array design. However, no recent studies demonstrate the optimization of the main MAE parameters (temperature, pressure, time, solvent type, and volume) for PAHs in different matrices, using chemometric approaches. Table 3 summarises the best MAE conditions obtained in the literature for PAHs in contaminated soils and sediments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
Includes bibliographical references
Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogenic environmental pollutants that are extremely hydrophobic in nature and resistant to biological degradation. Extraction of PAHs from environmental matrices is the first and most crucial step in PAH quantification. Extraction followed by quantification is essential to understand the extent of contamination prior to the application of remediation approaches. Due to their non-polar structures, PAHs can be adsorbed tightly to the organic matter in soils and sediments, making them more difficult to be extracted. Extraction of PAHs can be achieved by a variety of methods. Techniques such as supercritical and subcritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted solvent extraction, plant oil-assisted extraction and some microextraction techniques provide faster PAH extraction using less organic solvents, while providing a more environmentally friendly and safer process with minimum matrix interferences. More recently, more environmentally friendly methods for soil and sediment remediation have been explored. This often involves using natural chemicals, such as biosurfactants, to solubilize PAHs in contaminated soils and sediments to allow subsequent microbial degradation. Vermiremediation and microbial enzyme-mediated remediation are emerging approaches, which require further development. The following summarises the existing literature on traditional PAH extraction and bioremediation methods and contrasts them to newer, more environmentally friendly ways.
AB - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are carcinogenic environmental pollutants that are extremely hydrophobic in nature and resistant to biological degradation. Extraction of PAHs from environmental matrices is the first and most crucial step in PAH quantification. Extraction followed by quantification is essential to understand the extent of contamination prior to the application of remediation approaches. Due to their non-polar structures, PAHs can be adsorbed tightly to the organic matter in soils and sediments, making them more difficult to be extracted. Extraction of PAHs can be achieved by a variety of methods. Techniques such as supercritical and subcritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted solvent extraction, plant oil-assisted extraction and some microextraction techniques provide faster PAH extraction using less organic solvents, while providing a more environmentally friendly and safer process with minimum matrix interferences. More recently, more environmentally friendly methods for soil and sediment remediation have been explored. This often involves using natural chemicals, such as biosurfactants, to solubilize PAHs in contaminated soils and sediments to allow subsequent microbial degradation. Vermiremediation and microbial enzyme-mediated remediation are emerging approaches, which require further development. The following summarises the existing literature on traditional PAH extraction and bioremediation methods and contrasts them to newer, more environmentally friendly ways.
KW - Bioremediation
KW - Extraction
KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
KW - Sediment
KW - Soil
KW - Biodegradation, Environmental
KW - Solvents
KW - Soil Pollutants/analysis
KW - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120864396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120864396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132981
DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132981
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34826448
AN - SCOPUS:85120864396
SN - 0045-6535
VL - 291
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Chemosphere
JF - Chemosphere
IS - Part 3
M1 - 132981
ER -