Position statement: Research and reconciliation with Indigenous peoples in rural health journals

Mark John Lock, Faye Beverley McMillan, Bindi Bennett, Jodie Martire, Donald Warne, Jacquie Kidd, Naomi G. Williams, Paul Worley, Peter Hutten‑Czapski, Russell Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

It is time to plant a flag in the White soil of academic journal publishing and declare, ‘This discourse includes the cultural voices of Indigenous peoples’. Indigenous peoples are almost invisible as academic authors in rural health journals. Occasionally, that indigeneity might be deduced from the institutional or organisational affiliation statements, or the acknowledgements, or the text of articles. Too frequently, it is not discernible in any way. In essence, Indigenous cultural identity is suppressed by the conventions of academic publishing. This sees author and subject credibility resting on Western views of provenance, including institutional affiliation, college membership, educational qualifications and disciplinary background. This research colonialism reflects a power imbalance that must end.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-7
Number of pages2
JournalAustralian Journal of Rural Health
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Position statement: Research and reconciliation with Indigenous peoples in rural health journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this