Post-anthropocentric social work: Transformative philosophy for contemporary theory and practice

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter in textbook/reference bookpeer-review

Abstract

Social work, as a profession and as an academic discipline, is based on principles of respect for diversity, equity, beneficence, non-maleficence and collective responsibility. Through critical reflection on systems of structural oppression, social work aims to resist oppression through transformative action and to work for sustainable improvements to wellbeing and justice for all. From an affirmative, creative, and hopeful stance, this chapter explores post-anthropocentrism and posthumanism as transformative paradigms for evolving contemporary social work. Before engaging with these paradigms, the modernist, anthropocentric foundations of conventional mainstream social work are considered in the context of persistent global inequities and injustices. A rationale for the transformation of social work is then articulated as the foundation for a reimagined future for the evolving profession, beyond the anthropocene. Using relational ethics as a compass, key aspects of transformative social work are conceptualised drawing from post-anthropocentric and critical posthumanist theory. To close the chapter, some broader implications are explored including the possibilities s as well as
challenges for post-anthropocentric social work in the twenty-first century.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial work theory and ethics
Subtitle of host publicationIdeas in practice
EditorsDorothee Holscher, Richard Hugman, Donna McAuliffe
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherSpringer
Chapter7
Pages121 - 139
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9789811910159
ISBN (Print)9789811910142
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameSocial Work
ISSN (Print)2946-5052
ISSN (Electronic)2946-5060

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Post-anthropocentric social work: Transformative philosophy for contemporary theory and practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this