Potential utility of B-Type natriuretic peptides in secondary prevention following percutaneous coronary intervention in remote communities of Western Australia

Peter J. Tually, Geoff Currie, Nat P. Lenzo, Delia V. Hendrie, Jack W. Meadows, Johan H. A. Janssen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: A third of all acute coronary events that present in the Australian population occur in patients with established coronary heart disease. This study assessed the prognostic value of combined B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) measurement and quantitative myocardial perfusion scan (MPS) data for cardiac events (CE). Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 133 patients from rural Western Australia. The cut-off for normality was 6.0 for qualitative summed difference scores (SDS) of MPS and 400 pg/mL for BNP. Results: Patients with no CE had a mean SDS and BNP (1.52 with a 95% CI of 0.34 to 2.69), (175.9 with a 95% CI of 112.7-239.1) that was lower than patients with CE (6.54 with 95% CI 4.18-9.89) (P = 0.0003), (669.1 with 95% CI 543.9-794.3) (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of combined testing for predicting CE respectively were 79.6% and 86.3% for SDS, 84.6% and 94.1% for BNP, and 100% and 92.7% for SDS and BNP combined. Discussion and conclusion: Elevated BNP is marginally superior to MPS in predicting CEs in patients who have previously undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, MPS can identify the region of myocardium most at risk. Routine BNP monitoring in this subgroup may serve as secondary prevention by identifying subclinical disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-465
Number of pages8
JournalBiomarkers
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Potential utility of B-Type natriuretic peptides in secondary prevention following percutaneous coronary intervention in remote communities of Western Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this