TY - JOUR
T1 - Practical precooling
T2 - effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions
AU - Quod, Marc. J
AU - Martin, David.T.
AU - Laursen, Paul.B.
AU - Gardner, A.S.
AU - Halson, S.L.
AU - Marino, Francesco
AU - Tate, M.P.
AU - Mainwaring, D.E.
AU - Gore, Christopher J.
AU - Hahn, Allan G.
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Journal of Sports Sciences. ISSNs: 0264-0414;
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two practical precooling techniques (skin cooling vs. skin + core cooling) on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Six trained cyclists completed one maximal graded exercise test ([Vdot]O2peak 71.4 ± 3.2 ml ·kg-1 ·min-1) and four ~40 min laboratory cycling time trials in a heat chamber (34.3°C ± 1.1°C; 41.2% ± 3.0% rh) using a fixed-power/variable-power format. Cyclists prepared for the time trial using three techniques administered in a randomised order prior to the warm-up: (1) no cooling (control), (2) cooling jacket for 40 min (jacket) or (3) 30-min water immersion followed by a cooling jacket application for 40 min (combined). Rectal temperature prior to the time trial was 37.8°C ± 0.1°C in control, similar in jacket (37.8°C ± 0.3°C) and lower in combined (37.1°C ± 0.2°C, P < 0.01). Compared with the control trial, time trial performance was not different for jacket precooling (-16 ± 36 s, -0.7%; P = 0.35) but was faster for combined precooling (-42 ± 25 s, -1.8%; P = 0.009). In conclusion, a practical combined precooling strategy that involves immersion in cool water followed by the use of a cooling jacket can produce decrease in rectal temperature that persist throughout a warm-up and improve laboratory cycling time trial performance in warm conditions.
AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two practical precooling techniques (skin cooling vs. skin + core cooling) on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Six trained cyclists completed one maximal graded exercise test ([Vdot]O2peak 71.4 ± 3.2 ml ·kg-1 ·min-1) and four ~40 min laboratory cycling time trials in a heat chamber (34.3°C ± 1.1°C; 41.2% ± 3.0% rh) using a fixed-power/variable-power format. Cyclists prepared for the time trial using three techniques administered in a randomised order prior to the warm-up: (1) no cooling (control), (2) cooling jacket for 40 min (jacket) or (3) 30-min water immersion followed by a cooling jacket application for 40 min (combined). Rectal temperature prior to the time trial was 37.8°C ± 0.1°C in control, similar in jacket (37.8°C ± 0.3°C) and lower in combined (37.1°C ± 0.2°C, P < 0.01). Compared with the control trial, time trial performance was not different for jacket precooling (-16 ± 36 s, -0.7%; P = 0.35) but was faster for combined precooling (-42 ± 25 s, -1.8%; P = 0.009). In conclusion, a practical combined precooling strategy that involves immersion in cool water followed by the use of a cooling jacket can produce decrease in rectal temperature that persist throughout a warm-up and improve laboratory cycling time trial performance in warm conditions.
KW - Cold water immersion
KW - Cooling jacket
KW - Core temperature
KW - Fatigue
U2 - 10.1080/02640410802298268
DO - 10.1080/02640410802298268
M3 - Article
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 26
SP - 1477
EP - 1487
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 14
ER -