Pusey and scripture: Dead end or fertile ground?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Pusey is often characterised as obscurantist and conservative in his
rejection of the higher literary criticism of the Bible in the later part
of the nineteenth century. Much of the criticism of Pusey has focused
on a limited assessment of Pusey as a scriptural scholar and
on unfair psychological analysis. This article examines Pusey’s epistemology
more deeply and concludes that he had a breadth of vision
which commends itself to the modern world as a critique of reason
rather than a rejection of reason. Pusey’s role as a biblical scholar is
reassessed within the broad context of the Oxford Movement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-715
Number of pages18
JournalNew Blackfriars: A review
Volume101
Issue number1096
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 03 Dec 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pusey and scripture: Dead end or fertile ground?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this