'Real' Violence? Gender and (male) violence: An Australian perspective.

Catherine Seymour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Based on the findings of an exploratory study, this article focuses on the ways in which a group of South Australian practitioners, engaged in work with men who are violent towards their female partners, construct and understand male violence. Evident in the participants' understandings of violence is a tendency, firstly, to dichotomise violence into two 'types' - that directed towards other men and that directed at women; and, secondly, to categorise violence as either 'normal'/unremarkable (male-to-male violence) or gendered ('domestic' violence). In distinguishing between gendered violence and 'other' violence, such as that between men in the public sphere, the latter is constructed as 'ordinary' violence, worthy of intervention in only certain, 'extreme' or excessive, circumstances. It is argued that these understandings, based upon a conflation of masculinity and violence, reflect the broader context of gendered power, disciplinary knowledge and expertise, and have significant implications for the ways in which male violence is explained and addressed, and, in the Australian context, the associated marginalisation of domestic violence as an area of professional intervention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-44
Number of pages16
JournalProbation Journal
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

violence
gender
domestic violence
masculinity
expertise
Group

Cite this

Seymour, Catherine. / 'Real' Violence? Gender and (male) violence : An Australian perspective. In: Probation Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 56, No. 1. pp. 29-44.
@article{6c3535d40c4d4df7acc69c10a543db25,
title = "'Real' Violence? Gender and (male) violence: An Australian perspective.",
abstract = "Based on the findings of an exploratory study, this article focuses on the ways in which a group of South Australian practitioners, engaged in work with men who are violent towards their female partners, construct and understand male violence. Evident in the participants' understandings of violence is a tendency, firstly, to dichotomise violence into two 'types' - that directed towards other men and that directed at women; and, secondly, to categorise violence as either 'normal'/unremarkable (male-to-male violence) or gendered ('domestic' violence). In distinguishing between gendered violence and 'other' violence, such as that between men in the public sphere, the latter is constructed as 'ordinary' violence, worthy of intervention in only certain, 'extreme' or excessive, circumstances. It is argued that these understandings, based upon a conflation of masculinity and violence, reflect the broader context of gendered power, disciplinary knowledge and expertise, and have significant implications for the ways in which male violence is explained and addressed, and, in the Australian context, the associated marginalisation of domestic violence as an area of professional intervention.",
keywords = "Domestic violence, Gendered violence, Male violence, Masculinity, Violence intervention",
author = "Catherine Seymour",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Probation Journal: the journal of community and criminal justice. ISSNs: 0264-5505;",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1177/0264550508099714",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "29--44",
journal = "Probation Journal",
issn = "0264-5505",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

'Real' Violence? Gender and (male) violence : An Australian perspective. / Seymour, Catherine.

In: Probation Journal, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2009, p. 29-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Real' Violence? Gender and (male) violence

T2 - An Australian perspective.

AU - Seymour, Catherine

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Probation Journal: the journal of community and criminal justice. ISSNs: 0264-5505;

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Based on the findings of an exploratory study, this article focuses on the ways in which a group of South Australian practitioners, engaged in work with men who are violent towards their female partners, construct and understand male violence. Evident in the participants' understandings of violence is a tendency, firstly, to dichotomise violence into two 'types' - that directed towards other men and that directed at women; and, secondly, to categorise violence as either 'normal'/unremarkable (male-to-male violence) or gendered ('domestic' violence). In distinguishing between gendered violence and 'other' violence, such as that between men in the public sphere, the latter is constructed as 'ordinary' violence, worthy of intervention in only certain, 'extreme' or excessive, circumstances. It is argued that these understandings, based upon a conflation of masculinity and violence, reflect the broader context of gendered power, disciplinary knowledge and expertise, and have significant implications for the ways in which male violence is explained and addressed, and, in the Australian context, the associated marginalisation of domestic violence as an area of professional intervention.

AB - Based on the findings of an exploratory study, this article focuses on the ways in which a group of South Australian practitioners, engaged in work with men who are violent towards their female partners, construct and understand male violence. Evident in the participants' understandings of violence is a tendency, firstly, to dichotomise violence into two 'types' - that directed towards other men and that directed at women; and, secondly, to categorise violence as either 'normal'/unremarkable (male-to-male violence) or gendered ('domestic' violence). In distinguishing between gendered violence and 'other' violence, such as that between men in the public sphere, the latter is constructed as 'ordinary' violence, worthy of intervention in only certain, 'extreme' or excessive, circumstances. It is argued that these understandings, based upon a conflation of masculinity and violence, reflect the broader context of gendered power, disciplinary knowledge and expertise, and have significant implications for the ways in which male violence is explained and addressed, and, in the Australian context, the associated marginalisation of domestic violence as an area of professional intervention.

KW - Domestic violence

KW - Gendered violence

KW - Male violence

KW - Masculinity

KW - Violence intervention

U2 - 10.1177/0264550508099714

DO - 10.1177/0264550508099714

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 29

EP - 44

JO - Probation Journal

JF - Probation Journal

SN - 0264-5505

IS - 1

ER -