Reconsidering the efficiency of grazing exclusion using fences on the Tibetan Plateau

Jian Sun, Miao liu, Bojie Fu, David Kemp, Wenwu Zhao, Guohua Liu, Guodong Han, Andreas Wilkes, Xuyang Lu, Youchao Chen, Genwei Cheng, Tiancai Zhou, Ge Hou, Tianyu Zhan, Fei Peng, Hua Shang, Ming Xu, Peili Shi, Yongtao He, Meng LiJinniu Wang, Atsushi Tsunekawa, Huakun Zhou, Yu Liu, Yurui Li, Shiliang Liu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    177 Citations (Scopus)


    Grazing exclusion using fences is a key policy being applied by the Chinese government to rehabilitate degraded grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) and elsewhere. However, there is a limited understanding of the effects of grazing exclusion on alpine ecosystem functions and services and its impacts on herders’ livelihoods. Our meta-analyses and questionnaire-based surveys revealed that grazing exclusion with fences was effective in promoting aboveground vegetation growth for up to four years in degraded alpine meadows and for up to eight years in the alpine steppes of the TP. Longer-term fencing did not bring any ecological and economic benefits. We also found that fencing hindered wildlife movement, increased grazing pressure in unfenced areas, lowered the satisfaction of herders, and rendered substantial financial costs to both regional and national governments. We recommend that traditional free grazing should be encouraged if applicable, short-term fencing (for 4–8 years) should be adopted in severely degraded grasslands, and fencing should be avoided in key wildlife habitat areas, especially the protected large mammal species.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1405-1414
    Number of pages10
    JournalScience Bulletin
    Issue number16
    Early online date25 Apr 2020
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2020

    Grant Number

    • OPA101565
    • OPA5103


    Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering the efficiency of grazing exclusion using fences on the Tibetan Plateau'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this