Rejoinder

Michael Meyners; B. Thomas Carr; Anne Hasted

doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.015

Rejoinder

Michael Meyners
, B. Thomas Carr
, Anne Hasted

Psychology

Procter & Gamble Service GmbH
Qi Statistics Ltd

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Five commentaries by widely acknowledged experts were received for our initial letter regarding the use of replications in sensory studies. These commentaries are much appreciated, as they add substantial value to the discussion, covering various relevant aspects. Here, we reply to some of the main aspects and build on these further.

Original language	English
Article number	103715
Pages (from-to)	1-4
Number of pages	4
Journal	Food Quality and Preference
Volume	79
Early online date	24 Oct 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.015
Publication status	Published - Jan 2020

Access to Document

10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.015

Cite this

@article{04c465e6ce10469ba0e7e44b90510bb1,

title = "Rejoinder",

abstract = "Five commentaries by widely acknowledged experts were received for our initial letter regarding the use of replications in sensory studies. These commentaries are much appreciated, as they add substantial value to the discussion, covering various relevant aspects. Here, we reply to some of the main aspects and build on these further.",

keywords = "Replications, Sensory profiling, Statistical power",

author = "Michael Meyners and Carr, \{B. Thomas\} and Anne Hasted",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.015",

language = "English",

volume = "79",

pages = "1--4",

journal = "Food Quality and Preference",

issn = "0950-3293",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder

AU - Meyners, Michael

AU - Carr, B. Thomas

AU - Hasted, Anne

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Five commentaries by widely acknowledged experts were received for our initial letter regarding the use of replications in sensory studies. These commentaries are much appreciated, as they add substantial value to the discussion, covering various relevant aspects. Here, we reply to some of the main aspects and build on these further.

AB - Five commentaries by widely acknowledged experts were received for our initial letter regarding the use of replications in sensory studies. These commentaries are much appreciated, as they add substantial value to the discussion, covering various relevant aspects. Here, we reply to some of the main aspects and build on these further.

KW - Replications

KW - Sensory profiling

KW - Statistical power

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074001889

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074001889#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.05.015

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0950-3293

VL - 79

SP - 1

EP - 4

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

M1 - 103715

ER -

Rejoinder

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this