Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife

Euan G. Ritchie, Dale Nimmo, Corey JA Bradshaw, Mark Burgman, Jennifer K. Martin, Michael A. McCarthy, Kirsten M. Parris, Chris R. Dickman, Kris French, Richard J. Hobbs, Lesley Hughes, Christopher N. Johnson, Emma L Johnston, W. F. Laurance, David Lindenmayer, Ian Lunt, Sue McIntyre, Hugh Possingham, Robert L. Pressey, David Watson & 1 others J. C.Z. Woinarski

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policy and legislative changes by Australia's state governments are eroding the vital protection of the countryss unique biodiversity. Reserves are being opened up to ecologically disruptive activities, such as grazing by domestic livestock, logging, mining, recreational hunting and fishing, and commercial development. Protected habitats on private and leasehold land are imperilled too. Queensland and Victoria, for example, are relaxing hard-won laws that limit vegetation clearance on private land, further accelerating the loss of regional biodiversity. Collectively, these actions increase the pressure on biodiversity conservation in protected areas, many of which are already showing biodiversity loss (for example, the Kakadu National Park in northern Australia). Ecological connectivity is being lost, which will hamper the dispersal of species and their ability to respond to climate-change effects. Species extinctions are primed to increase. Too many of the country's unique fauna and flora have been wiped out over the past two centuries (see, for example, C. Johnson Australia's Mammal Extinctions; Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006), including the Christmas Island pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus murrayi) in 2009. There could be no worse time to weaken reserve protection and relax laws designed to reduce habitat loss.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434
Number of pages1
JournalNature
Volume498
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
Mammals
Climate change
Agriculture
Conservation

Cite this

Ritchie, E. G., Nimmo, D., Bradshaw, C. JA., Burgman, M., Martin, J. K., McCarthy, M. A., ... Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2013). Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife. Nature, 498, 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/498434d
Ritchie, Euan G. ; Nimmo, Dale ; Bradshaw, Corey JA ; Burgman, Mark ; Martin, Jennifer K. ; McCarthy, Michael A. ; Parris, Kirsten M. ; Dickman, Chris R. ; French, Kris ; Hobbs, Richard J. ; Hughes, Lesley ; Johnson, Christopher N. ; Johnston, Emma L ; Laurance, W. F. ; Lindenmayer, David ; Lunt, Ian ; McIntyre, Sue ; Possingham, Hugh ; Pressey, Robert L. ; Watson, David ; Woinarski, J. C.Z. / Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife. In: Nature. 2013 ; Vol. 498. pp. 434.
@article{29f286e49e564efda219933dd2065e26,
title = "Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife",
abstract = "Policy and legislative changes by Australia's state governments are eroding the vital protection of the countryss unique biodiversity. Reserves are being opened up to ecologically disruptive activities, such as grazing by domestic livestock, logging, mining, recreational hunting and fishing, and commercial development. Protected habitats on private and leasehold land are imperilled too. Queensland and Victoria, for example, are relaxing hard-won laws that limit vegetation clearance on private land, further accelerating the loss of regional biodiversity. Collectively, these actions increase the pressure on biodiversity conservation in protected areas, many of which are already showing biodiversity loss (for example, the Kakadu National Park in northern Australia). Ecological connectivity is being lost, which will hamper the dispersal of species and their ability to respond to climate-change effects. Species extinctions are primed to increase. Too many of the country's unique fauna and flora have been wiped out over the past two centuries (see, for example, C. Johnson Australia's Mammal Extinctions; Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006), including the Christmas Island pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus murrayi) in 2009. There could be no worse time to weaken reserve protection and relax laws designed to reduce habitat loss.",
author = "Ritchie, {Euan G.} and Dale Nimmo and Bradshaw, {Corey JA} and Mark Burgman and Martin, {Jennifer K.} and McCarthy, {Michael A.} and Parris, {Kirsten M.} and Dickman, {Chris R.} and Kris French and Hobbs, {Richard J.} and Lesley Hughes and Johnson, {Christopher N.} and Johnston, {Emma L} and Laurance, {W. F.} and David Lindenmayer and Ian Lunt and Sue McIntyre and Hugh Possingham and Pressey, {Robert L.} and David Watson and Woinarski, {J. C.Z.}",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Nature. ISSNs: 0028-0836;",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1038/498434d",
language = "English",
volume = "498",
pages = "434",
journal = "Nature: New biology",
issn = "0028-0836",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

Ritchie, EG, Nimmo, D, Bradshaw, CJA, Burgman, M, Martin, JK, McCarthy, MA, Parris, KM, Dickman, CR, French, K, Hobbs, RJ, Hughes, L, Johnson, CN, Johnston, EL, Laurance, WF, Lindenmayer, D, Lunt, I, McIntyre, S, Possingham, H, Pressey, RL, Watson, D & Woinarski, JCZ 2013, 'Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife', Nature, vol. 498, pp. 434. https://doi.org/10.1038/498434d

Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife. / Ritchie, Euan G.; Nimmo, Dale; Bradshaw, Corey JA; Burgman, Mark; Martin, Jennifer K.; McCarthy, Michael A.; Parris, Kirsten M. ; Dickman, Chris R.; French, Kris; Hobbs, Richard J.; Hughes, Lesley; Johnson, Christopher N.; Johnston, Emma L; Laurance, W. F.; Lindenmayer, David; Lunt, Ian; McIntyre, Sue; Possingham, Hugh; Pressey, Robert L. ; Watson, David; Woinarski, J. C.Z.

In: Nature, Vol. 498, 2013, p. 434.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife

AU - Ritchie, Euan G.

AU - Nimmo, Dale

AU - Bradshaw, Corey JA

AU - Burgman, Mark

AU - Martin, Jennifer K.

AU - McCarthy, Michael A.

AU - Parris, Kirsten M.

AU - Dickman, Chris R.

AU - French, Kris

AU - Hobbs, Richard J.

AU - Hughes, Lesley

AU - Johnson, Christopher N.

AU - Johnston, Emma L

AU - Laurance, W. F.

AU - Lindenmayer, David

AU - Lunt, Ian

AU - McIntyre, Sue

AU - Possingham, Hugh

AU - Pressey, Robert L.

AU - Watson, David

AU - Woinarski, J. C.Z.

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Nature. ISSNs: 0028-0836;

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Policy and legislative changes by Australia's state governments are eroding the vital protection of the countryss unique biodiversity. Reserves are being opened up to ecologically disruptive activities, such as grazing by domestic livestock, logging, mining, recreational hunting and fishing, and commercial development. Protected habitats on private and leasehold land are imperilled too. Queensland and Victoria, for example, are relaxing hard-won laws that limit vegetation clearance on private land, further accelerating the loss of regional biodiversity. Collectively, these actions increase the pressure on biodiversity conservation in protected areas, many of which are already showing biodiversity loss (for example, the Kakadu National Park in northern Australia). Ecological connectivity is being lost, which will hamper the dispersal of species and their ability to respond to climate-change effects. Species extinctions are primed to increase. Too many of the country's unique fauna and flora have been wiped out over the past two centuries (see, for example, C. Johnson Australia's Mammal Extinctions; Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006), including the Christmas Island pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus murrayi) in 2009. There could be no worse time to weaken reserve protection and relax laws designed to reduce habitat loss.

AB - Policy and legislative changes by Australia's state governments are eroding the vital protection of the countryss unique biodiversity. Reserves are being opened up to ecologically disruptive activities, such as grazing by domestic livestock, logging, mining, recreational hunting and fishing, and commercial development. Protected habitats on private and leasehold land are imperilled too. Queensland and Victoria, for example, are relaxing hard-won laws that limit vegetation clearance on private land, further accelerating the loss of regional biodiversity. Collectively, these actions increase the pressure on biodiversity conservation in protected areas, many of which are already showing biodiversity loss (for example, the Kakadu National Park in northern Australia). Ecological connectivity is being lost, which will hamper the dispersal of species and their ability to respond to climate-change effects. Species extinctions are primed to increase. Too many of the country's unique fauna and flora have been wiped out over the past two centuries (see, for example, C. Johnson Australia's Mammal Extinctions; Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006), including the Christmas Island pipistrelle bat (Pipistrellus murrayi) in 2009. There could be no worse time to weaken reserve protection and relax laws designed to reduce habitat loss.

U2 - 10.1038/498434d

DO - 10.1038/498434d

M3 - Letter

VL - 498

SP - 434

JO - Nature: New biology

JF - Nature: New biology

SN - 0028-0836

ER -

Ritchie EG, Nimmo D, Bradshaw CJA, Burgman M, Martin JK, McCarthy MA et al. Relaxed laws imperil Australian wildlife. Nature. 2013;498:434. https://doi.org/10.1038/498434d