Remaking the Country: Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission: 1943-46

Troy Whitford, Donald Boadle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission remains the most ambitious inquiry ever conducted into rural production and resource management, agricultural commodity marketing, and country lifestyle. Yet most commentary on the commission is cursory, unsupported by close textual analysis of the 330 recommendations in its ten published reports, and preoccupied with assessing whether commissioners satisfied ministerial expectations by ticking off recommendations which were actually implemented by federal and state governments. For the most trenchant of these commentators the commission's failure' is to be found in its preoccupation with rigorous long-term planning' and expert direction' of the rural sector which, it is claimed, no government could have contemplated at the end of a war fought to preserve individual freedoms. The present paper rejects this finding, arguing that this commentary is over-weighted to the regulatory, as opposed to the coordinating, function of the commission's institutional recommendations, and correspondingly neglectful of commissioners' commitment to the principles of individualism, mutuality and self-help. Convinced that country people had responsibilities as well as rights, commissioners exploited the procedural informality that a policy advisory inquiry allowed them to persuade stakeholders that sustainable rural development was not simply a matter of governments ameliorating problems of land utilisation and management, but of rural families on farms and rural communities in towns taking the initiative in addressing their own needs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-76
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of the Royal Australian Historical Society
Volume95
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

State Government
Social Planning
Federal Government
Conservation of Natural Resources
Rural Population
Marketing
Life Style
Farms
Direction compound
Warfare

Cite this

@article{34faa10c8d95421c950bfe7bede387b4,
title = "Remaking the Country: Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission: 1943-46",
abstract = "Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission remains the most ambitious inquiry ever conducted into rural production and resource management, agricultural commodity marketing, and country lifestyle. Yet most commentary on the commission is cursory, unsupported by close textual analysis of the 330 recommendations in its ten published reports, and preoccupied with assessing whether commissioners satisfied ministerial expectations by ticking off recommendations which were actually implemented by federal and state governments. For the most trenchant of these commentators the commission's failure' is to be found in its preoccupation with rigorous long-term planning' and expert direction' of the rural sector which, it is claimed, no government could have contemplated at the end of a war fought to preserve individual freedoms. The present paper rejects this finding, arguing that this commentary is over-weighted to the regulatory, as opposed to the coordinating, function of the commission's institutional recommendations, and correspondingly neglectful of commissioners' commitment to the principles of individualism, mutuality and self-help. Convinced that country people had responsibilities as well as rights, commissioners exploited the procedural informality that a policy advisory inquiry allowed them to persuade stakeholders that sustainable rural development was not simply a matter of governments ameliorating problems of land utilisation and management, but of rural families on farms and rural communities in towns taking the initiative in addressing their own needs.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Agricultural policy, Australia, History, Rural Reconstruction Commission",
author = "Troy Whitford and Donald Boadle",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society. ISSNs: 0035-8762;",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "52--76",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society",
issn = "0035-8762",
publisher = "Royal Australian Historical Society",
number = "1",

}

Remaking the Country : Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission: 1943-46. / Whitford, Troy; Boadle, Donald.

In: Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society, Vol. 95, No. 1, 2009, p. 52-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remaking the Country

T2 - Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission: 1943-46

AU - Whitford, Troy

AU - Boadle, Donald

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society. ISSNs: 0035-8762;

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission remains the most ambitious inquiry ever conducted into rural production and resource management, agricultural commodity marketing, and country lifestyle. Yet most commentary on the commission is cursory, unsupported by close textual analysis of the 330 recommendations in its ten published reports, and preoccupied with assessing whether commissioners satisfied ministerial expectations by ticking off recommendations which were actually implemented by federal and state governments. For the most trenchant of these commentators the commission's failure' is to be found in its preoccupation with rigorous long-term planning' and expert direction' of the rural sector which, it is claimed, no government could have contemplated at the end of a war fought to preserve individual freedoms. The present paper rejects this finding, arguing that this commentary is over-weighted to the regulatory, as opposed to the coordinating, function of the commission's institutional recommendations, and correspondingly neglectful of commissioners' commitment to the principles of individualism, mutuality and self-help. Convinced that country people had responsibilities as well as rights, commissioners exploited the procedural informality that a policy advisory inquiry allowed them to persuade stakeholders that sustainable rural development was not simply a matter of governments ameliorating problems of land utilisation and management, but of rural families on farms and rural communities in towns taking the initiative in addressing their own needs.

AB - Australia's Rural Reconstruction Commission remains the most ambitious inquiry ever conducted into rural production and resource management, agricultural commodity marketing, and country lifestyle. Yet most commentary on the commission is cursory, unsupported by close textual analysis of the 330 recommendations in its ten published reports, and preoccupied with assessing whether commissioners satisfied ministerial expectations by ticking off recommendations which were actually implemented by federal and state governments. For the most trenchant of these commentators the commission's failure' is to be found in its preoccupation with rigorous long-term planning' and expert direction' of the rural sector which, it is claimed, no government could have contemplated at the end of a war fought to preserve individual freedoms. The present paper rejects this finding, arguing that this commentary is over-weighted to the regulatory, as opposed to the coordinating, function of the commission's institutional recommendations, and correspondingly neglectful of commissioners' commitment to the principles of individualism, mutuality and self-help. Convinced that country people had responsibilities as well as rights, commissioners exploited the procedural informality that a policy advisory inquiry allowed them to persuade stakeholders that sustainable rural development was not simply a matter of governments ameliorating problems of land utilisation and management, but of rural families on farms and rural communities in towns taking the initiative in addressing their own needs.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Agricultural policy

KW - Australia

KW - History

KW - Rural Reconstruction Commission

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 52

EP - 76

JO - Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society

JF - Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society

SN - 0035-8762

IS - 1

ER -