Abstract
This paper addresses what should be an important question for many institutional ethics committees: How might they justifiably trust external peer review of the scientific merit of research proposals under their consideration, since these committees are typically not constituted to review the science themselves?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 169-185 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Publication status | Published - May 2015 |