Responsibility, expertise and trust: Institutional ethics committees and science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper addresses what should be an important question for many institutional ethics committees: How might they justifiably trust external peer review of the scientific merit of research proposals under their consideration, since these committees are typically not constituted to review the science themselves?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-185
Number of pages17
JournalHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Volume28
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responsibility, expertise and trust: Institutional ethics committees and science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this