Rethinking the 'Project'

Bridging the Polarized Discourses in IWRM

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Integrated water resource management (IWRM) is a response to current acknowledgement of the complexity and wickedness of water management. IWRM aims to enable appropriate responses via multi-party participation. Adaptive management-purposeful learning for improved action-is a useful tool for integrating water resource management. It provides a framework to enable participatory processes and social learning to contribute to changed policies and practices. However, the institutional constraints on moving to adaptive management (and hence IWRM) are many and deeply entrenched. The paper explores these constraints by considering the almost unconscious, and generally uncritical, reliance on 'projects' in natural resource management. Using examples from Australia, it reflects on the defining features of natural resource management 'projects' and critically considers these in relation to the conditions needed for adaptive management, social learning and IWRM. Projects, bounded in time and space and strongly tied to political and financial cycles, encourage short-term planning and action, not to mention risk avoidance and solidification of power differentials. Active reflection on the nature of projects provides a useful space to explore a possible clash between the normative idealistic and the critical realist perspectives of integrating water management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-241
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

adaptive management
learning
water management
solidification
resource management
natural resource
water resources management
project

Cite this

@article{81b710e600cf408884ea3222e2355083,
title = "Rethinking the 'Project': Bridging the Polarized Discourses in IWRM",
abstract = "Integrated water resource management (IWRM) is a response to current acknowledgement of the complexity and wickedness of water management. IWRM aims to enable appropriate responses via multi-party participation. Adaptive management-purposeful learning for improved action-is a useful tool for integrating water resource management. It provides a framework to enable participatory processes and social learning to contribute to changed policies and practices. However, the institutional constraints on moving to adaptive management (and hence IWRM) are many and deeply entrenched. The paper explores these constraints by considering the almost unconscious, and generally uncritical, reliance on 'projects' in natural resource management. Using examples from Australia, it reflects on the defining features of natural resource management 'projects' and critically considers these in relation to the conditions needed for adaptive management, social learning and IWRM. Projects, bounded in time and space and strongly tied to political and financial cycles, encourage short-term planning and action, not to mention risk avoidance and solidification of power differentials. Active reflection on the nature of projects provides a useful space to explore a possible clash between the normative idealistic and the critical realist perspectives of integrating water management.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Adaptive management, Integrated Water Resources Management, Project, Social learning",
author = "Catherine Allan",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = September, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. ISSNs: 1522-7200;",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/1523908X.2012.702012",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "231--241",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning",
issn = "1522-7200",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Rethinking the 'Project' : Bridging the Polarized Discourses in IWRM. / Allan, Catherine.

In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 14, No. 3, 09.2012, p. 231-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the 'Project'

T2 - Bridging the Polarized Discourses in IWRM

AU - Allan, Catherine

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = September, 2012; Journal title (773t) = Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. ISSNs: 1522-7200;

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Integrated water resource management (IWRM) is a response to current acknowledgement of the complexity and wickedness of water management. IWRM aims to enable appropriate responses via multi-party participation. Adaptive management-purposeful learning for improved action-is a useful tool for integrating water resource management. It provides a framework to enable participatory processes and social learning to contribute to changed policies and practices. However, the institutional constraints on moving to adaptive management (and hence IWRM) are many and deeply entrenched. The paper explores these constraints by considering the almost unconscious, and generally uncritical, reliance on 'projects' in natural resource management. Using examples from Australia, it reflects on the defining features of natural resource management 'projects' and critically considers these in relation to the conditions needed for adaptive management, social learning and IWRM. Projects, bounded in time and space and strongly tied to political and financial cycles, encourage short-term planning and action, not to mention risk avoidance and solidification of power differentials. Active reflection on the nature of projects provides a useful space to explore a possible clash between the normative idealistic and the critical realist perspectives of integrating water management.

AB - Integrated water resource management (IWRM) is a response to current acknowledgement of the complexity and wickedness of water management. IWRM aims to enable appropriate responses via multi-party participation. Adaptive management-purposeful learning for improved action-is a useful tool for integrating water resource management. It provides a framework to enable participatory processes and social learning to contribute to changed policies and practices. However, the institutional constraints on moving to adaptive management (and hence IWRM) are many and deeply entrenched. The paper explores these constraints by considering the almost unconscious, and generally uncritical, reliance on 'projects' in natural resource management. Using examples from Australia, it reflects on the defining features of natural resource management 'projects' and critically considers these in relation to the conditions needed for adaptive management, social learning and IWRM. Projects, bounded in time and space and strongly tied to political and financial cycles, encourage short-term planning and action, not to mention risk avoidance and solidification of power differentials. Active reflection on the nature of projects provides a useful space to explore a possible clash between the normative idealistic and the critical realist perspectives of integrating water management.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Integrated Water Resources Management

KW - Project

KW - Social learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865210552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865210552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1523908X.2012.702012

DO - 10.1080/1523908X.2012.702012

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 231

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

JF - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

SN - 1522-7200

IS - 3

ER -