Revealing Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Managers of land, water, and biodiversity are working with increasingly complex social ecological systems with high uncertainty. Adaptive management (learning from doing) is an ideal approach for working with this complexity. The competing social and environmental demands for water have prompted interest in freshwater adaptive management, but its success and uptake appear to be slow. Some of the perceived “failure” of adaptive management may reflect the way success is conceived and measured; learning, rarely used as an indicator of success, is narrowly defined when it is. In this paper, we document the process of adaptive flow management in the Edward-Wakool system in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Data are from interviews with environmental water managers, document review, and the authors’ structured reflection on their experiences of adaptive management and environmental flows. Substantial learning occurred in relation to the management of environmental flows in the Edward-Wakool system, with evidence found in planning documents, water-use reports, technical reports, stakeholder committee minutes, and refereed papers, while other evidence was anecdotal. Based on this case, we suggest it may be difficult for external observers to perceive the success of large adaptive management projects because evidence of learning is dispersed across multiple documents, and learning is not necessarily considered a measure of success. We suggest that documentation and sharing of new insights, and of the processes of learning, should be resourced to facilitate social learning within the water management sector, and to help demonstrate the successes of adaptive management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)520-533
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

adaptive management
learning
Water
Managers
Biodiversity
Water management
Project management
water
water use
water management
stakeholder
biodiversity
Planning
document
basin

Cite this

@article{fde38408a136446abf2a0a4d9cef84b8,
title = "Revealing Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows",
abstract = "Managers of land, water, and biodiversity are working with increasingly complex social ecological systems with high uncertainty. Adaptive management (learning from doing) is an ideal approach for working with this complexity. The competing social and environmental demands for water have prompted interest in freshwater adaptive management, but its success and uptake appear to be slow. Some of the perceived “failure” of adaptive management may reflect the way success is conceived and measured; learning, rarely used as an indicator of success, is narrowly defined when it is. In this paper, we document the process of adaptive flow management in the Edward-Wakool system in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Data are from interviews with environmental water managers, document review, and the authors’ structured reflection on their experiences of adaptive management and environmental flows. Substantial learning occurred in relation to the management of environmental flows in the Edward-Wakool system, with evidence found in planning documents, water-use reports, technical reports, stakeholder committee minutes, and refereed papers, while other evidence was anecdotal. Based on this case, we suggest it may be difficult for external observers to perceive the success of large adaptive management projects because evidence of learning is dispersed across multiple documents, and learning is not necessarily considered a measure of success. We suggest that documentation and sharing of new insights, and of the processes of learning, should be resourced to facilitate social learning within the water management sector, and to help demonstrate the successes of adaptive management.",
keywords = "Adaptive management, Environmental flows, Environmental water, Learning, Murray-Darling Basin, Social Ecological Systems",
author = "Catherine Allan and Watts, {Robyn J.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-017-0931-3",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "520--533",
journal = "Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Revealing Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows. / Allan, Catherine; Watts, Robyn J.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2018, p. 520-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revealing Adaptive Management of Environmental Flows

AU - Allan, Catherine

AU - Watts, Robyn J.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Managers of land, water, and biodiversity are working with increasingly complex social ecological systems with high uncertainty. Adaptive management (learning from doing) is an ideal approach for working with this complexity. The competing social and environmental demands for water have prompted interest in freshwater adaptive management, but its success and uptake appear to be slow. Some of the perceived “failure” of adaptive management may reflect the way success is conceived and measured; learning, rarely used as an indicator of success, is narrowly defined when it is. In this paper, we document the process of adaptive flow management in the Edward-Wakool system in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Data are from interviews with environmental water managers, document review, and the authors’ structured reflection on their experiences of adaptive management and environmental flows. Substantial learning occurred in relation to the management of environmental flows in the Edward-Wakool system, with evidence found in planning documents, water-use reports, technical reports, stakeholder committee minutes, and refereed papers, while other evidence was anecdotal. Based on this case, we suggest it may be difficult for external observers to perceive the success of large adaptive management projects because evidence of learning is dispersed across multiple documents, and learning is not necessarily considered a measure of success. We suggest that documentation and sharing of new insights, and of the processes of learning, should be resourced to facilitate social learning within the water management sector, and to help demonstrate the successes of adaptive management.

AB - Managers of land, water, and biodiversity are working with increasingly complex social ecological systems with high uncertainty. Adaptive management (learning from doing) is an ideal approach for working with this complexity. The competing social and environmental demands for water have prompted interest in freshwater adaptive management, but its success and uptake appear to be slow. Some of the perceived “failure” of adaptive management may reflect the way success is conceived and measured; learning, rarely used as an indicator of success, is narrowly defined when it is. In this paper, we document the process of adaptive flow management in the Edward-Wakool system in the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Data are from interviews with environmental water managers, document review, and the authors’ structured reflection on their experiences of adaptive management and environmental flows. Substantial learning occurred in relation to the management of environmental flows in the Edward-Wakool system, with evidence found in planning documents, water-use reports, technical reports, stakeholder committee minutes, and refereed papers, while other evidence was anecdotal. Based on this case, we suggest it may be difficult for external observers to perceive the success of large adaptive management projects because evidence of learning is dispersed across multiple documents, and learning is not necessarily considered a measure of success. We suggest that documentation and sharing of new insights, and of the processes of learning, should be resourced to facilitate social learning within the water management sector, and to help demonstrate the successes of adaptive management.

KW - Adaptive management

KW - Environmental flows

KW - Environmental water

KW - Learning

KW - Murray-Darling Basin

KW - Social Ecological Systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028850556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028850556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-017-0931-3

DO - 10.1007/s00267-017-0931-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 28871321

AN - SCOPUS:85028850556

VL - 61

SP - 520

EP - 533

JO - Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors

JF - Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 3

ER -