Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance

Stewart Lockie, Vaughan Higgins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the last 15 years, agri-environmental programmes in Australia have been underpinned by a neoliberal regime of governing which seeks to foster participation and 'bottom-up' change at the regional level at the same time as encouraging farmers to become entrepreneurial and improve their productivity and environmental performance without government interference. However, while experiencing a degree of success in terms of farmer involvement, considerable tensions are evident in such programmes. Drawing on an 'analytics of governmentality', this paper argues that while current agri-environmental programmes enable authorities to combine often competing and contradictory imperatives under the rubric of single political problems'what has been termed hybrid forms of governing'it also contributes to the continuing failure of these programmes to achieve their desired effects. As a consequence, neoliberal forms of governing tend to be characterised by experimentation with a range of governmental technologies in order to make programmes workable in practice. We explore two different types of technologies'standards schemes and direct government regulation'that have emerged in recent years, and how these have sought to address the limitations evident in 'participatory' programmes. The paper concludes by arguing that while these initiatives seek to encourage farmer compliance in seemingly divergent ways, their capacity to be workable, and have broader effects, in practice will depend upon their capacity to manage the competing imperatives of environmental degradation, capital accumulation and private property rights.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
governance
regulation
farmer
property rights
environmental degradation
compliance
private property
capital accumulation
governmentality
environmental damage
right of ownership
productivity
programme
interference
regime
participation
performance
environmental programme
effect

Cite this

@article{c2decdfef1a446c099bed25e6be2c45f,
title = "Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance",
abstract = "In the last 15 years, agri-environmental programmes in Australia have been underpinned by a neoliberal regime of governing which seeks to foster participation and 'bottom-up' change at the regional level at the same time as encouraging farmers to become entrepreneurial and improve their productivity and environmental performance without government interference. However, while experiencing a degree of success in terms of farmer involvement, considerable tensions are evident in such programmes. Drawing on an 'analytics of governmentality', this paper argues that while current agri-environmental programmes enable authorities to combine often competing and contradictory imperatives under the rubric of single political problems'what has been termed hybrid forms of governing'it also contributes to the continuing failure of these programmes to achieve their desired effects. As a consequence, neoliberal forms of governing tend to be characterised by experimentation with a range of governmental technologies in order to make programmes workable in practice. We explore two different types of technologies'standards schemes and direct government regulation'that have emerged in recent years, and how these have sought to address the limitations evident in 'participatory' programmes. The paper concludes by arguing that while these initiatives seek to encourage farmer compliance in seemingly divergent ways, their capacity to be workable, and have broader effects, in practice will depend upon their capacity to manage the competing imperatives of environmental degradation, capital accumulation and private property rights.",
author = "Stewart Lockie and Vaughan Higgins",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = Jan 2007; Journal title (773t) = Journal of Rural Studies. ISSNs: 0743-0167;",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.011",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance. / Lockie, Stewart; Higgins, Vaughan.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance

AU - Lockie, Stewart

AU - Higgins, Vaughan

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = Jan 2007; Journal title (773t) = Journal of Rural Studies. ISSNs: 0743-0167;

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - In the last 15 years, agri-environmental programmes in Australia have been underpinned by a neoliberal regime of governing which seeks to foster participation and 'bottom-up' change at the regional level at the same time as encouraging farmers to become entrepreneurial and improve their productivity and environmental performance without government interference. However, while experiencing a degree of success in terms of farmer involvement, considerable tensions are evident in such programmes. Drawing on an 'analytics of governmentality', this paper argues that while current agri-environmental programmes enable authorities to combine often competing and contradictory imperatives under the rubric of single political problems'what has been termed hybrid forms of governing'it also contributes to the continuing failure of these programmes to achieve their desired effects. As a consequence, neoliberal forms of governing tend to be characterised by experimentation with a range of governmental technologies in order to make programmes workable in practice. We explore two different types of technologies'standards schemes and direct government regulation'that have emerged in recent years, and how these have sought to address the limitations evident in 'participatory' programmes. The paper concludes by arguing that while these initiatives seek to encourage farmer compliance in seemingly divergent ways, their capacity to be workable, and have broader effects, in practice will depend upon their capacity to manage the competing imperatives of environmental degradation, capital accumulation and private property rights.

AB - In the last 15 years, agri-environmental programmes in Australia have been underpinned by a neoliberal regime of governing which seeks to foster participation and 'bottom-up' change at the regional level at the same time as encouraging farmers to become entrepreneurial and improve their productivity and environmental performance without government interference. However, while experiencing a degree of success in terms of farmer involvement, considerable tensions are evident in such programmes. Drawing on an 'analytics of governmentality', this paper argues that while current agri-environmental programmes enable authorities to combine often competing and contradictory imperatives under the rubric of single political problems'what has been termed hybrid forms of governing'it also contributes to the continuing failure of these programmes to achieve their desired effects. As a consequence, neoliberal forms of governing tend to be characterised by experimentation with a range of governmental technologies in order to make programmes workable in practice. We explore two different types of technologies'standards schemes and direct government regulation'that have emerged in recent years, and how these have sought to address the limitations evident in 'participatory' programmes. The paper concludes by arguing that while these initiatives seek to encourage farmer compliance in seemingly divergent ways, their capacity to be workable, and have broader effects, in practice will depend upon their capacity to manage the competing imperatives of environmental degradation, capital accumulation and private property rights.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.011

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

IS - 1

ER -