Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)25-42
    Number of pages18
    JournalAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    Early online date13 Dec 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Fingerprint

    private land
    wetland
    cropping practice
    cost sharing
    ecological impact
    management
    occupation
    draining
    incentive
    assets
    farmer
    conservation
    learning
    Law
    economics
    cost

    Cite this

    @article{abc31edfa2ff40d3b15337a0cd74b23f,
    title = "Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land",
    abstract = "Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.",
    keywords = "Agriculture, Australia, risk interpretation, social acceptability, wetlands",
    author = "Emily Mendham and Allan Curtis",
    year = "2019",
    doi = "10.1080/14486563.2018.1543059",
    language = "English",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "25--42",
    journal = "Australasian Journal of Environmental Management",
    issn = "1448-6563",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land

    AU - Mendham, Emily

    AU - Curtis, Allan

    PY - 2019

    Y1 - 2019

    N2 - Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.

    AB - Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.

    KW - Agriculture

    KW - Australia

    KW - risk interpretation

    KW - social acceptability

    KW - wetlands

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058706479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058706479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2018.1543059

    DO - 10.1080/14486563.2018.1543059

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85058706479

    VL - 26

    SP - 25

    EP - 42

    JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

    JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

    SN - 1448-6563

    IS - 1

    ER -