Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-42
Number of pages18
JournalAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management
Volume26
Issue number1
Early online date13 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

private land
wetland
cropping practice
cost sharing
ecological impact
management
occupation
draining
incentive
assets
farmer
conservation
learning
Law
economics
cost

Cite this

@article{abc31edfa2ff40d3b15337a0cd74b23f,
title = "Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land",
abstract = "Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Australia, risk interpretation, social acceptability, wetlands",
author = "Emily Mendham and Allan Curtis",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/14486563.2018.1543059",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "25--42",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "1448-6563",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural landholder judgements about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands on private land

AU - Mendham, Emily

AU - Curtis, Allan

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.

AB - Some landholders who have cropping enterprises utilise wetlands on their properties, even where such actions are unlawful. The ecological impacts of cropping or draining these environmental assets will vary, but the outcomes can be dramatic and irreversible. This article examines the judgements of rural landholders about the acceptability of cropping or draining wetlands. Data were gathered through a survey of rural landholders in western Victoria. Rural landholders were more likely to judge cropping or draining wetlands to be unacceptable than acceptable. Respondents who found these practices acceptable were more likely to have a business orientation and be farmers by occupation. Almost a third of respondents indicated they were ‘unsure’, suggesting there is an opportunity to influence their attitudes. However, the ‘unsure’ were more similar to those who found cropping or draining wetlands acceptable. Economic opportunities provided by these practices are an important barrier to conservation efforts. We suggest that management agencies target landholders with wetlands and offer financial incentives for their active management beyond that required by law, and provide learning opportunities around wetlands. It may also be necessary to more actively monitor and prosecute illegal activity to complement the existing focus on extension and cost sharing for on-ground work.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Australia

KW - risk interpretation

KW - social acceptability

KW - wetlands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058706479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058706479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2018.1543059

DO - 10.1080/14486563.2018.1543059

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 25

EP - 42

JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 1448-6563

IS - 1

ER -