TY - JOUR
T1 - Semantic priming of expectancies among high and low restraint non-problem drinkers
AU - Cumming, Steven
AU - Harris, Lynne
AU - Kiernan, Michael
AU - Williams, Robert
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Australian Journal of Psychology. ISSNs: 0004-9530;
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - This report presents a cognitive measure of drinking expectancies based on semantic priming methodologies, and it investigates differences between high and low drinking restraint undergraduates. Reaction time to an emotion name (e.g., sociable) was measured when that word was preceded by a drinking-related word (e.g., beer) and when preceded by a neutral word (e.g., book). One hundred and four undergraduate students were administered the 'differentiated' Restrained Drinking Scale (Ruderman & McKiman, 1984; Collins, George, & Lapp, 1989), a drinking behaviour questionnaire, and completed the priming task. High and low-restraint drinkers were found to differ significantly in the extent and direction of priming to positive and negative emotional-word targets, with the high-restraint drinkers taking longer to recognise positive words. The results suggest that, in the absence of an alcohol pre-load, highly restrained drinkers have weaker positive drinking expectancies than their less restrained peers. The priming procedure overcomes problems of response manipulation that may be present in self-report measures of expectancies.
AB - This report presents a cognitive measure of drinking expectancies based on semantic priming methodologies, and it investigates differences between high and low drinking restraint undergraduates. Reaction time to an emotion name (e.g., sociable) was measured when that word was preceded by a drinking-related word (e.g., beer) and when preceded by a neutral word (e.g., book). One hundred and four undergraduate students were administered the 'differentiated' Restrained Drinking Scale (Ruderman & McKiman, 1984; Collins, George, & Lapp, 1989), a drinking behaviour questionnaire, and completed the priming task. High and low-restraint drinkers were found to differ significantly in the extent and direction of priming to positive and negative emotional-word targets, with the high-restraint drinkers taking longer to recognise positive words. The results suggest that, in the absence of an alcohol pre-load, highly restrained drinkers have weaker positive drinking expectancies than their less restrained peers. The priming procedure overcomes problems of response manipulation that may be present in self-report measures of expectancies.
U2 - 10.1080/00049530108255139
DO - 10.1080/00049530108255139
M3 - Article
SN - 0004-9530
VL - 53
SP - 155
EP - 159
JO - Australian Journal of Psychology
JF - Australian Journal of Psychology
IS - 3
ER -