TY - JOUR
T1 - Service blueprinting and BPMN
T2 - A comparison
AU - Milton, Simon K.
AU - Johnson, Lester W.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - PMN in increasing numbers. Knowing how BPMN supports and undermines service blueprinting is important, because service to customers is the ultimate goal for all firms. Therefore, representing service processes requires the parts of service blueprints to be supported in BPMN. Business process outsourcing adds further urgency for the need to adequately represent the parts of service processes in BPMN.Purpose â€Â' The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast a customer-focused service process diagram tool (blueprinting) with an organizational-focused process diagram tool (business process modeling notation, or BPMN).Design/methodology/approach â€Â' Using a hotel stay as an example, the paper presents both a service blueprint and a BPMN diagram. The authors then explicitly discuss the similarities, differences resulting from an ontological comparison of service blueprints and BPMN, and show where the two tools can be complementary. Findings â€Â' The authors have found that one similarity is that service blueprinting segments processes into parts that are similar to BPMN’s idea of swimlanes. However, the swimlanes in service blueprinting separate customer actions, customer-facing employees’ actions and functions, and back-stage functions, actors, and information systems, thereby effectively mandating certain swimlanes for the purpose of analyzing points of contact between the firm and a customer. Another similarity is that service blueprinting deliberately differentiates between different functional areas and roles within each area to highlight, and IT systems. But it does this to make clear where actions move across organizational boundaries to avoid damaging service support, and also to explain to back-office staff their role in supporting on-stage customer interactions. Unlike BPMN, service blueprinting has physical evidence as front-stage indicators to customers of service quality and to constrain customer actions by carefully designing the servicescape.Research limitations/implications â€Â' A limitation is that the paper only uses one example (a hotel stay).Practical implications â€Â' The comparison provides service managers with guidance as to how to use the two tools interactively.Originality/value â€Â' Firms, to represent business processes, are using B
AB - PMN in increasing numbers. Knowing how BPMN supports and undermines service blueprinting is important, because service to customers is the ultimate goal for all firms. Therefore, representing service processes requires the parts of service blueprints to be supported in BPMN. Business process outsourcing adds further urgency for the need to adequately represent the parts of service processes in BPMN.Purpose â€Â' The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast a customer-focused service process diagram tool (blueprinting) with an organizational-focused process diagram tool (business process modeling notation, or BPMN).Design/methodology/approach â€Â' Using a hotel stay as an example, the paper presents both a service blueprint and a BPMN diagram. The authors then explicitly discuss the similarities, differences resulting from an ontological comparison of service blueprints and BPMN, and show where the two tools can be complementary. Findings â€Â' The authors have found that one similarity is that service blueprinting segments processes into parts that are similar to BPMN’s idea of swimlanes. However, the swimlanes in service blueprinting separate customer actions, customer-facing employees’ actions and functions, and back-stage functions, actors, and information systems, thereby effectively mandating certain swimlanes for the purpose of analyzing points of contact between the firm and a customer. Another similarity is that service blueprinting deliberately differentiates between different functional areas and roles within each area to highlight, and IT systems. But it does this to make clear where actions move across organizational boundaries to avoid damaging service support, and also to explain to back-office staff their role in supporting on-stage customer interactions. Unlike BPMN, service blueprinting has physical evidence as front-stage indicators to customers of service quality and to constrain customer actions by carefully designing the servicescape.Research limitations/implications â€Â' A limitation is that the paper only uses one example (a hotel stay).Practical implications â€Â' The comparison provides service managers with guidance as to how to use the two tools interactively.Originality/value â€Â' Firms, to represent business processes, are using B
KW - Business process modelling
KW - Business process modelling notation
KW - Hotels
KW - Modelling
KW - Ontological analysis
KW - Organisational processes
KW - Service blueprinting
U2 - 10.1108/09604521211287570
DO - 10.1108/09604521211287570
M3 - Article
SN - 2055-6225
VL - 22
SP - 606
EP - 621
JO - Journal of Service Theory and Practice
JF - Journal of Service Theory and Practice
IS - 6
ER -