Serving inland rural communities through university clinics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: To effectively provide clinical placements for students and increase healthcare options for rural communities, an investigation of university clinics was conducted. Method: This project adopted a consultative inquiry strategy and involved two processes: (1) a review of literature; and (2) interviews with existing health sciences clinic staff. Results: Low income population groups are more likely to find student-provided services acceptable and have a reliable demand for these services if they are accessible. University clinics reporting high client numbers had a consistent flow of low income clients with chronic problems. Private healthcare providers were often unable to meet the demand from this group. However, multiple methods and flexibility of delivery that fitted in with local services were required rather than single point of access clinics. Discussion: University clinics are an effective way of providing clinical placements for students and some healthcare for rural communities. Key aspects of the community context that make a university clinic viable are the degree of disadvantage in a community, the population density (or dispersion), the workforce available to supply health services in the public and private sectors, and the types of services that are demanded by policy or lobby groups and not yet supplied. © 2011 SAGE Publications
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-480
Number of pages6
JournalHealth Education Journal
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Rural Population
Students
Delivery of Health Care
Private Sector
Public Sector
Poverty
Population Density
Population Groups
Health Personnel
Health Services
Publications
Interviews
Health

Cite this

@article{6d138ff4d68848e4adb606501228442b,
title = "Serving inland rural communities through university clinics",
abstract = "Aim: To effectively provide clinical placements for students and increase healthcare options for rural communities, an investigation of university clinics was conducted. Method: This project adopted a consultative inquiry strategy and involved two processes: (1) a review of literature; and (2) interviews with existing health sciences clinic staff. Results: Low income population groups are more likely to find student-provided services acceptable and have a reliable demand for these services if they are accessible. University clinics reporting high client numbers had a consistent flow of low income clients with chronic problems. Private healthcare providers were often unable to meet the demand from this group. However, multiple methods and flexibility of delivery that fitted in with local services were required rather than single point of access clinics. Discussion: University clinics are an effective way of providing clinical placements for students and some healthcare for rural communities. Key aspects of the community context that make a university clinic viable are the degree of disadvantage in a community, the population density (or dispersion), the workforce available to supply health services in the public and private sectors, and the types of services that are demanded by policy or lobby groups and not yet supplied. {\~A}‚{\^A}{\circledC} 2011 SAGE Publications",
keywords = "Clinical placement, Health care, Health education, Rural, Student, University clinic",
author = "Julaine Allan and Rodney Pope and Joy Higgs and Peter O'Meara and Jennifer Kent",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = December, 2011; Journal title (773t) = Health Education Journal. ISSNs: 0017-8969;",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0017896911403209",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "475--480",
journal = "Health Education Journal",
issn = "0017-8969",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Serving inland rural communities through university clinics. / Allan, Julaine; Pope, Rodney; Higgs, Joy; O'Meara, Peter; Kent, Jennifer.

In: Health Education Journal, Vol. 70, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 475-480.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serving inland rural communities through university clinics

AU - Allan, Julaine

AU - Pope, Rodney

AU - Higgs, Joy

AU - O'Meara, Peter

AU - Kent, Jennifer

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = December, 2011; Journal title (773t) = Health Education Journal. ISSNs: 0017-8969;

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Aim: To effectively provide clinical placements for students and increase healthcare options for rural communities, an investigation of university clinics was conducted. Method: This project adopted a consultative inquiry strategy and involved two processes: (1) a review of literature; and (2) interviews with existing health sciences clinic staff. Results: Low income population groups are more likely to find student-provided services acceptable and have a reliable demand for these services if they are accessible. University clinics reporting high client numbers had a consistent flow of low income clients with chronic problems. Private healthcare providers were often unable to meet the demand from this group. However, multiple methods and flexibility of delivery that fitted in with local services were required rather than single point of access clinics. Discussion: University clinics are an effective way of providing clinical placements for students and some healthcare for rural communities. Key aspects of the community context that make a university clinic viable are the degree of disadvantage in a community, the population density (or dispersion), the workforce available to supply health services in the public and private sectors, and the types of services that are demanded by policy or lobby groups and not yet supplied. © 2011 SAGE Publications

AB - Aim: To effectively provide clinical placements for students and increase healthcare options for rural communities, an investigation of university clinics was conducted. Method: This project adopted a consultative inquiry strategy and involved two processes: (1) a review of literature; and (2) interviews with existing health sciences clinic staff. Results: Low income population groups are more likely to find student-provided services acceptable and have a reliable demand for these services if they are accessible. University clinics reporting high client numbers had a consistent flow of low income clients with chronic problems. Private healthcare providers were often unable to meet the demand from this group. However, multiple methods and flexibility of delivery that fitted in with local services were required rather than single point of access clinics. Discussion: University clinics are an effective way of providing clinical placements for students and some healthcare for rural communities. Key aspects of the community context that make a university clinic viable are the degree of disadvantage in a community, the population density (or dispersion), the workforce available to supply health services in the public and private sectors, and the types of services that are demanded by policy or lobby groups and not yet supplied. © 2011 SAGE Publications

KW - Clinical placement

KW - Health care

KW - Health education

KW - Rural

KW - Student

KW - University clinic

U2 - 10.1177/0017896911403209

DO - 10.1177/0017896911403209

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 475

EP - 480

JO - Health Education Journal

JF - Health Education Journal

SN - 0017-8969

IS - 4

ER -